Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical Challenges in Psychosurgery: A New Start or More of the Same?

Paul A. Komesaroff, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

There has been a resurgence in the practice of psychosurgery in the last decade primarily for depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. This is due to the application of deep brain stimulation (which has largely replaced lesioning) and to a greater understanding of the imaging correlates of mental illness. Psychosurgery is expanding well beyond these indications. Many ethical challenges arise, including informed consent, establishing the efficacy of these procedures from the literature and in the design of new studies, the harm versus benefit ratio, and the role of institutional and governmental regulatory control over psychosurgery. Psychosurgery remains experimental or at least investigational and the ethical considerations should be of prime importance for any practitioner undertaking this surgery. We propose eighteen principles as a basis for a regulatory framework of psychosurgery. Neurosurgeons who perform psychosurgery have an immense responsibility to guard against a repeat of the failures of the past.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEthics in Neurosurgical Practice
EditorsStephen Honeybul
Place of PublicationCambridge UK
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter18
Pages175-192
Number of pages18
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781108643887
ISBN (Print)9781108494120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • conflicts of interest
  • consent
  • DBS
  • deep brain stimulation
  • ethics
  • evidence
  • psychosurgery
  • regulation

Cite this