Abstract
This article studies estimators of the odds ratio and odds ratio regression parameters in finely matched case-control studies containing a binary exposure of primary interest and subject-specific covariates that are subject to measurement error. A retrospective logistic regression model for the binary exposure variable is used. The effect of measurement errors on the conditional maximum likelihood estimator is determined. Three alternatives are considered: bias-corrected, functional, and “transformation” estimators. The asymptotic and small-sample properties of the three competitors are studied. The results are illustrated using data from a case-control study of diet and colon cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1075-1084 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Statistical Association |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 431 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Bias correction
- Conditional maximum likelihood
- Errors in variables
- Logistic regression
- Retrospective study
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver