TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry
AU - Jayasinghe, Randi T.
AU - Ruseckaite, Rasa
AU - Dean, Joanne
AU - Kartik, Aruna
AU - Wickremasinghe, Anagi C.
AU - Daly, Oliver
AU - O’Connell, Helen E.
AU - Craig, Amanda
AU - Duggan, Anne
AU - Vasiliadis, Dora
AU - Karantanis, Emmanuel
AU - Gallagher, Elizabeth
AU - Holme, Gwili
AU - Keck, James
AU - Williams, Jarrod
AU - King, Jennifer
AU - Yin, Jessica
AU - Short, John
AU - Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine
AU - Brennan, Pip
AU - Rayner, Sally
AU - Ahern, Susannah
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by the Australian Department of Health. H.E. O’Connell is the Vice-President of the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ), and is also a consult at Teleflex, Astellas and AMBU companies. H.E. O’Connell has also received grants for a pilot study and a study tour/skills practice.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment. Methods: The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events. Results: Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia,that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitmentand data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites thatare awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiledfor submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and haveentered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered inthe APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and aconsumer-friendly public report in 2022. Conclusions: The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care.
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment. Methods: The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events. Results: Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia,that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitmentand data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites thatare awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiledfor submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and haveentered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered inthe APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and aconsumer-friendly public report in 2022. Conclusions: The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care.
KW - Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry
KW - Clinical Quality Registry
KW - Pelvic Floor Procedures, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Devices and Prostheses, Stress Urinary Incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146856265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8
DO - 10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36695860
AN - SCOPUS:85146856265
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 34
SP - 1697
EP - 1704
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
ER -