Abstract
An authors' error occurred in this paper by Christopher K Fairley and others (23 January, pp 233-5). In table II the male to female ratio was reversed. It should be 22 to 29 in cases and 113 to 86 in controls
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1179-1179 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | British Medical Journal |
| Volume | 307 |
| Issue number | 6913 |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Nov 1993 |