Erratum: Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046)

Michael Anenburg; Hugh St C. O'Neill

doi:10.1093/petrology/egab050

Erratum: Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

Abstract

"On page 1827, the phase rule is incorrectly written as F=Φ-C+2. The correct form of the phase rule is F=C-Φ+2. This correction does not affect any arguments made in the paper.".

Original language	English
Article number	egab050
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Petrology
Volume	62
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egab050
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2021
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1093/petrology/egab050Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{8689af136a654fc8a961e5fdb1d46106,

title = "Erratum: Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046)",

abstract = "{"}On page 1827, the phase rule is incorrectly written as F=Φ-C+2. The correct form of the phase rule is F=C-Φ+2. This correction does not affect any arguments made in the paper.{"}.",

author = "Michael Anenburg and O'Neill, {Hugh St C.}",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/petrology/egab050",

language = "English",

volume = "62",

journal = "Journal of Petrology",

issn = "0022-3530",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "5",

}

Erratum: Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046). / Anenburg, Michael; O'Neill, Hugh St C.
In: Journal of Petrology, Vol. 62, No. 5, egab050, 01.05.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046)

AU - Anenburg, Michael

AU - O'Neill, Hugh St C.

PY - 2021/5/1

Y1 - 2021/5/1

N2 - "On page 1827, the phase rule is incorrectly written as F=Φ-C+2. The correct form of the phase rule is F=C-Φ+2. This correction does not affect any arguments made in the paper.".

AB - "On page 1827, the phase rule is incorrectly written as F=Φ-C+2. The correct form of the phase rule is F=C-Φ+2. This correction does not affect any arguments made in the paper.".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118156124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/petrology/egab050

DO - 10.1093/petrology/egab050

M3 - Comment / Debate

AN - SCOPUS:85118156124

SN - 0022-3530

VL - 62

JO - Journal of Petrology

JF - Journal of Petrology

IS - 5

M1 - egab050

ER -

Erratum: Redox in magmas: Comment on a recent treatment of the kaiserstuhl volcanics (braunger et al., journal of petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and some other misconceptions (Journal of Petrology DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egz046)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Redox in Magmas: Comment on a Recent Treatment of the Kaiserstuhl Volcanics (Braunger et al., Journal of Petrology, 59, 1731-1762, 2018) and Some Other Misconceptions

Cite this