Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

When Ernest Newman wrote his first book, Gluck and the Opera (1895), he considered it a pioneering work of musical scholarship. Never before, claimed Newman, had the comparative method been utilized in music research and his biography of Gluck would remedy the situation. But what did Newman mean by the ‘comparative method’ and how was this method, which had been used by a variety of writers in the past, adapted and appropriated by him? In this chapter I examine the intellectual circumstances that informed Newman’s use of, and approach to, a particular kind of musical criticism. I argue that his rationalist ideology, formed in his youth by literary and history scholars, piqued his interest not only in history, but also in biography and criticism that fashioned for Newman an arguably distinctive comparative method. By drawing on some of Newman’s other books and periodical articles of the period I tease out the nuances of his approach to musical studies that involved a complex coalescing of ideas about criticism, biography and history. I illustrate that Newman’s work in the 1890s ushered in a new generation of British criticism not seen since George Hogarth’s Musical History, Biography and Criticism of the 1830s and which was met with some resistance by some of Newman’s contemporaries such as John F. Runciman and George Bernard Shaw.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBritish Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950
EditorsJeremy Dibble, Julian Horton
Place of PublicationWoodbridge Suffolk UK
PublisherBoydell & Brewer
Chapter4
Pages84–101
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781787442801
ISBN (Print)9781783272877
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Publication series

NameMusic in Britain, 1600–2000
PublisherBoydell Press

Keywords

  • Music criticism
  • Comparative methods
  • biography
  • historiography
  • Nineteenth century

Cite this

Watt, P. (2018). Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History. In J. Dibble, & J. Horton (Eds.), British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950 (pp. 84–101). (Music in Britain, 1600–2000). Woodbridge Suffolk UK: Boydell & Brewer.
Watt, Paul. / Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History. British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950. editor / Jeremy Dibble ; Julian Horton. Woodbridge Suffolk UK : Boydell & Brewer, 2018. pp. 84–101 (Music in Britain, 1600–2000).
@inbook{2bff86f38ce5415f9f518572ecdafbfb,
title = "Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History",
abstract = "When Ernest Newman wrote his first book, Gluck and the Opera (1895), he considered it a pioneering work of musical scholarship. Never before, claimed Newman, had the comparative method been utilized in music research and his biography of Gluck would remedy the situation. But what did Newman mean by the ‘comparative method’ and how was this method, which had been used by a variety of writers in the past, adapted and appropriated by him? In this chapter I examine the intellectual circumstances that informed Newman’s use of, and approach to, a particular kind of musical criticism. I argue that his rationalist ideology, formed in his youth by literary and history scholars, piqued his interest not only in history, but also in biography and criticism that fashioned for Newman an arguably distinctive comparative method. By drawing on some of Newman’s other books and periodical articles of the period I tease out the nuances of his approach to musical studies that involved a complex coalescing of ideas about criticism, biography and history. I illustrate that Newman’s work in the 1890s ushered in a new generation of British criticism not seen since George Hogarth’s Musical History, Biography and Criticism of the 1830s and which was met with some resistance by some of Newman’s contemporaries such as John F. Runciman and George Bernard Shaw.",
keywords = "Music criticism, Comparative methods, biography, historiography, Nineteenth century",
author = "Paul Watt",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781783272877",
series = "Music in Britain, 1600–2000",
publisher = "Boydell & Brewer",
pages = "84–101",
editor = "Jeremy Dibble and Julian Horton",
booktitle = "British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950",

}

Watt, P 2018, Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History. in J Dibble & J Horton (eds), British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950. Music in Britain, 1600–2000, Boydell & Brewer, Woodbridge Suffolk UK, pp. 84–101.

Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History. / Watt, Paul.

British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950. ed. / Jeremy Dibble; Julian Horton. Woodbridge Suffolk UK : Boydell & Brewer, 2018. p. 84–101 (Music in Britain, 1600–2000).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History

AU - Watt, Paul

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - When Ernest Newman wrote his first book, Gluck and the Opera (1895), he considered it a pioneering work of musical scholarship. Never before, claimed Newman, had the comparative method been utilized in music research and his biography of Gluck would remedy the situation. But what did Newman mean by the ‘comparative method’ and how was this method, which had been used by a variety of writers in the past, adapted and appropriated by him? In this chapter I examine the intellectual circumstances that informed Newman’s use of, and approach to, a particular kind of musical criticism. I argue that his rationalist ideology, formed in his youth by literary and history scholars, piqued his interest not only in history, but also in biography and criticism that fashioned for Newman an arguably distinctive comparative method. By drawing on some of Newman’s other books and periodical articles of the period I tease out the nuances of his approach to musical studies that involved a complex coalescing of ideas about criticism, biography and history. I illustrate that Newman’s work in the 1890s ushered in a new generation of British criticism not seen since George Hogarth’s Musical History, Biography and Criticism of the 1830s and which was met with some resistance by some of Newman’s contemporaries such as John F. Runciman and George Bernard Shaw.

AB - When Ernest Newman wrote his first book, Gluck and the Opera (1895), he considered it a pioneering work of musical scholarship. Never before, claimed Newman, had the comparative method been utilized in music research and his biography of Gluck would remedy the situation. But what did Newman mean by the ‘comparative method’ and how was this method, which had been used by a variety of writers in the past, adapted and appropriated by him? In this chapter I examine the intellectual circumstances that informed Newman’s use of, and approach to, a particular kind of musical criticism. I argue that his rationalist ideology, formed in his youth by literary and history scholars, piqued his interest not only in history, but also in biography and criticism that fashioned for Newman an arguably distinctive comparative method. By drawing on some of Newman’s other books and periodical articles of the period I tease out the nuances of his approach to musical studies that involved a complex coalescing of ideas about criticism, biography and history. I illustrate that Newman’s work in the 1890s ushered in a new generation of British criticism not seen since George Hogarth’s Musical History, Biography and Criticism of the 1830s and which was met with some resistance by some of Newman’s contemporaries such as John F. Runciman and George Bernard Shaw.

KW - Music criticism

KW - Comparative methods

KW - biography

KW - historiography

KW - Nineteenth century

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781783272877

T3 - Music in Britain, 1600–2000

SP - 84

EP - 101

BT - British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950

A2 - Dibble, Jeremy

A2 - Horton, Julian

PB - Boydell & Brewer

CY - Woodbridge Suffolk UK

ER -

Watt P. Ernest Newman and the Promise of Method in Biography, Criticism and History. In Dibble J, Horton J, editors, British Musical Criticism and Intellectual Thought, 1850–1950. Woodbridge Suffolk UK: Boydell & Brewer. 2018. p. 84–101. (Music in Britain, 1600–2000).