Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making

A systematic review

Haylee Lane, Mitchell Sarkies, Jennifer Martin, Terry Haines

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To identify elements of endorsed definitions of equity in healthcare and classify domains of these definitions so that policy makers, managers, clinicians, and politicians can form an operational definition of equity that reflects the values and preferences of the society they serve. Design Systematic review where verbatim text describing explicit and implicit definitions of equity were extracted and subjected to a thematic analysis. Data sources The full holdings of the AMED, CINAHL plus, OVID Medline, Scopus, PsychInfo and ProQuest (ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, ProQuest Social Science Journals) were individually searched in April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were included if they provided an original, explicit or implicit definition of equity in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Papers that only cited earlier definitions of equity and provided no new information or extensions to this definition were excluded. Results The search strategy yielded 74 papers appropriate for this review; 60 of these provided an explicit definition of equity, with a further 14 papers discussing implicit elements of equity that the authors endorsed in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Five key themes emerged i) Equalisation across the health service supply/access/outcome chain, ii) Need or potential to benefit, iii) Groupings of equalisation, iv) Caveats to equalisation, and v) Close enough is good enough. Conclusions There is great inconsistency in definitions of equity endorsed by different authors. Operational definitions of equity need to be more explicit in addressing these five thematic areas before they can be directly applied to healthcare resource allocation decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-27
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume175
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Equity
  • Healthcare
  • Resource allocation

Cite this

Lane, Haylee ; Sarkies, Mitchell ; Martin, Jennifer ; Haines, Terry. / Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making : A systematic review. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 175. pp. 11-27.
@article{d719476789cb4f198c2ff0c08ed5d0a2,
title = "Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective To identify elements of endorsed definitions of equity in healthcare and classify domains of these definitions so that policy makers, managers, clinicians, and politicians can form an operational definition of equity that reflects the values and preferences of the society they serve. Design Systematic review where verbatim text describing explicit and implicit definitions of equity were extracted and subjected to a thematic analysis. Data sources The full holdings of the AMED, CINAHL plus, OVID Medline, Scopus, PsychInfo and ProQuest (ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, ProQuest Social Science Journals) were individually searched in April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were included if they provided an original, explicit or implicit definition of equity in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Papers that only cited earlier definitions of equity and provided no new information or extensions to this definition were excluded. Results The search strategy yielded 74 papers appropriate for this review; 60 of these provided an explicit definition of equity, with a further 14 papers discussing implicit elements of equity that the authors endorsed in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Five key themes emerged i) Equalisation across the health service supply/access/outcome chain, ii) Need or potential to benefit, iii) Groupings of equalisation, iv) Caveats to equalisation, and v) Close enough is good enough. Conclusions There is great inconsistency in definitions of equity endorsed by different authors. Operational definitions of equity need to be more explicit in addressing these five thematic areas before they can be directly applied to healthcare resource allocation decisions.",
keywords = "Decision making, Equity, Healthcare, Resource allocation",
author = "Haylee Lane and Mitchell Sarkies and Jennifer Martin and Terry Haines",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012",
language = "English",
volume = "175",
pages = "11--27",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making : A systematic review. / Lane, Haylee; Sarkies, Mitchell; Martin, Jennifer; Haines, Terry.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 175, 01.02.2017, p. 11-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Lane, Haylee

AU - Sarkies, Mitchell

AU - Martin, Jennifer

AU - Haines, Terry

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective To identify elements of endorsed definitions of equity in healthcare and classify domains of these definitions so that policy makers, managers, clinicians, and politicians can form an operational definition of equity that reflects the values and preferences of the society they serve. Design Systematic review where verbatim text describing explicit and implicit definitions of equity were extracted and subjected to a thematic analysis. Data sources The full holdings of the AMED, CINAHL plus, OVID Medline, Scopus, PsychInfo and ProQuest (ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, ProQuest Social Science Journals) were individually searched in April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were included if they provided an original, explicit or implicit definition of equity in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Papers that only cited earlier definitions of equity and provided no new information or extensions to this definition were excluded. Results The search strategy yielded 74 papers appropriate for this review; 60 of these provided an explicit definition of equity, with a further 14 papers discussing implicit elements of equity that the authors endorsed in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Five key themes emerged i) Equalisation across the health service supply/access/outcome chain, ii) Need or potential to benefit, iii) Groupings of equalisation, iv) Caveats to equalisation, and v) Close enough is good enough. Conclusions There is great inconsistency in definitions of equity endorsed by different authors. Operational definitions of equity need to be more explicit in addressing these five thematic areas before they can be directly applied to healthcare resource allocation decisions.

AB - Objective To identify elements of endorsed definitions of equity in healthcare and classify domains of these definitions so that policy makers, managers, clinicians, and politicians can form an operational definition of equity that reflects the values and preferences of the society they serve. Design Systematic review where verbatim text describing explicit and implicit definitions of equity were extracted and subjected to a thematic analysis. Data sources The full holdings of the AMED, CINAHL plus, OVID Medline, Scopus, PsychInfo and ProQuest (ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, ProQuest Social Science Journals) were individually searched in April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were included if they provided an original, explicit or implicit definition of equity in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Papers that only cited earlier definitions of equity and provided no new information or extensions to this definition were excluded. Results The search strategy yielded 74 papers appropriate for this review; 60 of these provided an explicit definition of equity, with a further 14 papers discussing implicit elements of equity that the authors endorsed in regards to healthcare resource allocation decision making. Five key themes emerged i) Equalisation across the health service supply/access/outcome chain, ii) Need or potential to benefit, iii) Groupings of equalisation, iv) Caveats to equalisation, and v) Close enough is good enough. Conclusions There is great inconsistency in definitions of equity endorsed by different authors. Operational definitions of equity need to be more explicit in addressing these five thematic areas before they can be directly applied to healthcare resource allocation decisions.

KW - Decision making

KW - Equity

KW - Healthcare

KW - Resource allocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007499721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012

M3 - Review Article

VL - 175

SP - 11

EP - 27

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -