Equity, efficiency and financial viability: public-utility pricing with special reference to water supply

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The pricing and investment policies of a public enterprise should be designed to achieve efficiency since equity is better pursued by general policy regarding income distribution. Short‐run marginal‐cost pricing does not generally lead to long‐term deficit, but may involve price and surplus/deficit cycles for the case with lumpy investments and growing demand, where the price increases with demand but is reduced with capacity expansion. Taking account of the extra costs of government revenue collection and the likely average price/cost ratio in the economy, the third‐best pricing policy is likely to result in long‐term surplus, making the objectives of equity, efficiency and financial viability much more consistent with each other than is generally believed. This is particularly true for water with historically increasing costs of additional sources of supply. 1987 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-35
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Economic Review
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1987

Cite this