'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions

Normann Witzleb

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)503 - 531
    Number of pages29
    JournalThe Sydney Law Review
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Cite this

    Witzleb, Normann. / 'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions. In: The Sydney Law Review. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 503 - 531.
    @article{7cece7a05d30456284f31049ddc77c65,
    title = "'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions",
    author = "Normann Witzleb",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "503 -- 531",
    journal = "The Sydney Law Review",
    issn = "0082-0512",
    publisher = "Sydney Law School",
    number = "3",

    }

    Witzleb, N 2010, ''Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions', The Sydney Law Review, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 503 - 531.

    'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions. / Witzleb, Normann.

    In: The Sydney Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2010, p. 503 - 531.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions

    AU - Witzleb, Normann

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 503

    EP - 531

    JO - The Sydney Law Review

    JF - The Sydney Law Review

    SN - 0082-0512

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Witzleb N. 'Equity does not act in vain': an analysis of futility arguments in claims for injunctions. The Sydney Law Review. 2010;32(3):503 - 531.