Abstract
The normative foundations of the environmental movement can be thought of in a range of different ways. The present paper is a commentary on very interesting papers by Thomas Dunlap, Thomas Hill and Kimberly Smith, who take up the spiritual, ethical and political perspectives respectively. Their accounts are described and evaluated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 355-363 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Environmental Values |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Death of environmentalism
- Eckersley
- Environmental movement
- Intrinsic value
- Leopold
- Middle-level values
- Mutual accountability
- Nature
- Nordhaus
- Plural values
- Rawls
- Religion
- Scanlon
- Schellenberger
- Social contract