TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing the Detection and Care of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Primary Care
T2 - Cost-Effectiveness and Return on Investment
AU - Marquina, Clara
AU - Morton, Jedidiah
AU - Brett, Tom
AU - Lloyd, Melanie
AU - Radford, Jan
AU - Heal, Clare
AU - Hespe, Charlotte
AU - Gill, Gerard
AU - Sullivan, David
AU - Zomer, Ella
AU - Li, Ian
AU - Pang, Jing
AU - Watts, Gerald F.
AU - Ademi, Zanfina
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council fund (Partnership grant GNT 1142885).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is under-detected and undertreated. A general practitioner-led screening and care program for HeFH effectively identified and managed patients with HeFH. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and the return on investment of an enhanced-care strategy for HeFH in primary care in Australia. Methods: We developed a multistate Markov model to estimate the outcomes and costs of a general practitioner-led detection and management strategy for HeFH in primary care compared with the standard of care in Australia. The population comprised individuals aged 50 to 80 years, of which 44% had prior cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk, HeFH prevalence, treatment effects, and acute and chronic health care costs were derived from published sources. The study involved screening for HeFH using a validated data-extraction tool (TARB-Ex), followed by a consultation to improve care. The detection rate of HeFH was 16%, and 74% of the patients achieved target LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, productivity losses, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and return on investment ratio were evaluated, outcomes discounted by 5% annually, adopting a health care and a societal perspective. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, the model estimated a gain of 870 years of life lived and 1033 quality-adjusted life years when the general practitioner-led program was employed compared with standard of care. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$14 664/quality-adjusted life year gained from a health care perspective. From a societal perspective, this strategy, compared with standard of care was cost-saving, with a return on investment of AU$5.64 per dollar invested. Conclusions: An enhanced general practitioner-led model of care for HeFH is likely to be cost-effective.
AB - Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is under-detected and undertreated. A general practitioner-led screening and care program for HeFH effectively identified and managed patients with HeFH. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and the return on investment of an enhanced-care strategy for HeFH in primary care in Australia. Methods: We developed a multistate Markov model to estimate the outcomes and costs of a general practitioner-led detection and management strategy for HeFH in primary care compared with the standard of care in Australia. The population comprised individuals aged 50 to 80 years, of which 44% had prior cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk, HeFH prevalence, treatment effects, and acute and chronic health care costs were derived from published sources. The study involved screening for HeFH using a validated data-extraction tool (TARB-Ex), followed by a consultation to improve care. The detection rate of HeFH was 16%, and 74% of the patients achieved target LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, productivity losses, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and return on investment ratio were evaluated, outcomes discounted by 5% annually, adopting a health care and a societal perspective. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, the model estimated a gain of 870 years of life lived and 1033 quality-adjusted life years when the general practitioner-led program was employed compared with standard of care. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$14 664/quality-adjusted life year gained from a health care perspective. From a societal perspective, this strategy, compared with standard of care was cost-saving, with a return on investment of AU$5.64 per dollar invested. Conclusions: An enhanced general practitioner-led model of care for HeFH is likely to be cost-effective.
KW - cardiovascular disease
KW - hypercholesterolemia
KW - prevalence
KW - proprotein convertase
KW - subtilisin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85163416519
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCGEN.122.003842
DO - 10.1161/CIRCGEN.122.003842
M3 - Article
C2 - 37042242
AN - SCOPUS:85163416519
SN - 2574-8300
VL - 16
SP - 267
EP - 274
JO - Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
JF - Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
IS - 3
ER -