Enforcing labour rights of irregular migrants in Indonesia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The multi-directional nature of labour migration flows has resulted in an increasing number of countries having become both senders and receivers of regular and irregular migrants. However, some countries continue to see themselves primarily as senders and so ignore their role as a receiving country, which can have negative implications for the rights of migrants in their territory. Using the example of Indonesia, which is State Party to the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families, this article demonstrates that irregular migrant workers in this country have the legal right to protection against labour exploitation even when they work despite the government’s prohibition on employment. The article discusses the ‘right to work’ and how international human rights law has translated it into the ‘right to protection from labour exploitation’ for irregular migrants in Indonesia. By way of two case studies about the Indonesian government’s handling of irregular migrants, it shows how it prioritises enforcement of the employment immigration law over labour and employment laws much like countries that have not ratified the ICRMW. It also draws attention to legal protection gaps that emerge for asylum seekers when they are recognised to be genuine refugees.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)908-925
Number of pages18
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Asylum seeker
  • human trafficking
  • Indonesia
  • Labour migration
  • migrant rights
  • right to work

Cite this

@article{0f53392534a2471d85e391515220a7e6,
title = "Enforcing labour rights of irregular migrants in Indonesia",
abstract = "The multi-directional nature of labour migration flows has resulted in an increasing number of countries having become both senders and receivers of regular and irregular migrants. However, some countries continue to see themselves primarily as senders and so ignore their role as a receiving country, which can have negative implications for the rights of migrants in their territory. Using the example of Indonesia, which is State Party to the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families, this article demonstrates that irregular migrant workers in this country have the legal right to protection against labour exploitation even when they work despite the government’s prohibition on employment. The article discusses the ‘right to work’ and how international human rights law has translated it into the ‘right to protection from labour exploitation’ for irregular migrants in Indonesia. By way of two case studies about the Indonesian government’s handling of irregular migrants, it shows how it prioritises enforcement of the employment immigration law over labour and employment laws much like countries that have not ratified the ICRMW. It also draws attention to legal protection gaps that emerge for asylum seekers when they are recognised to be genuine refugees.",
keywords = "Asylum seeker, human trafficking, Indonesia, Labour migration, migrant rights, right to work",
author = "Wayne Palmer and Antje Missbach",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2018.1522586",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "908--925",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Enforcing labour rights of irregular migrants in Indonesia. / Palmer, Wayne; Missbach, Antje.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2019, p. 908-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enforcing labour rights of irregular migrants in Indonesia

AU - Palmer, Wayne

AU - Missbach, Antje

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The multi-directional nature of labour migration flows has resulted in an increasing number of countries having become both senders and receivers of regular and irregular migrants. However, some countries continue to see themselves primarily as senders and so ignore their role as a receiving country, which can have negative implications for the rights of migrants in their territory. Using the example of Indonesia, which is State Party to the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families, this article demonstrates that irregular migrant workers in this country have the legal right to protection against labour exploitation even when they work despite the government’s prohibition on employment. The article discusses the ‘right to work’ and how international human rights law has translated it into the ‘right to protection from labour exploitation’ for irregular migrants in Indonesia. By way of two case studies about the Indonesian government’s handling of irregular migrants, it shows how it prioritises enforcement of the employment immigration law over labour and employment laws much like countries that have not ratified the ICRMW. It also draws attention to legal protection gaps that emerge for asylum seekers when they are recognised to be genuine refugees.

AB - The multi-directional nature of labour migration flows has resulted in an increasing number of countries having become both senders and receivers of regular and irregular migrants. However, some countries continue to see themselves primarily as senders and so ignore their role as a receiving country, which can have negative implications for the rights of migrants in their territory. Using the example of Indonesia, which is State Party to the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families, this article demonstrates that irregular migrant workers in this country have the legal right to protection against labour exploitation even when they work despite the government’s prohibition on employment. The article discusses the ‘right to work’ and how international human rights law has translated it into the ‘right to protection from labour exploitation’ for irregular migrants in Indonesia. By way of two case studies about the Indonesian government’s handling of irregular migrants, it shows how it prioritises enforcement of the employment immigration law over labour and employment laws much like countries that have not ratified the ICRMW. It also draws attention to legal protection gaps that emerge for asylum seekers when they are recognised to be genuine refugees.

KW - Asylum seeker

KW - human trafficking

KW - Indonesia

KW - Labour migration

KW - migrant rights

KW - right to work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054681480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2018.1522586

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2018.1522586

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 908

EP - 925

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 5

ER -