Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion

John Reader; Petar Jandrić; Michael A. Peters; Ronald Barnett; Marcin Garbowski; Veronika Lipińska; Sharon Rider; Ibrar Bhatt; Abdassamad Clarke; Morteza Hashemi; Andrew Bevan; Eric Trozzo; Alison MacKenzie; Jared J. Aldern; Cheryl E. Matias; Georgina Tuari Stewart; Carl Mika; Peter McLaren; Tim Fawns; Jeremy Knox; Maggi Savin-Baden; Liz Jackson; Nina Hood; Marek Tesar; Steve Fuller; Chris Baker

doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion

John Reader, Petar Jandrić, Michael A. Peters, Ronald Barnett, Marcin Garbowski, Veronika Lipińska, Sharon Rider, Ibrar Bhatt, Abdassamad Clarke, Morteza Hashemi, Andrew Bevan, Eric Trozzo, Alison MacKenzie, Jared J. Aldern, Cheryl E. Matias, Georgina Tuari Stewart, Carl Mika, Peter McLaren, Tim Fawns, Jeremy KnoxMaggi Savin-Baden, Liz Jackson, Nina Hood, Marek Tesar, Steve Fuller, Chris Baker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Other › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This collectively written article explores postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion within the continuum of enchantment, disenchantment, and re-enchantment. Contributions are broadly classified within four sections related to academic fields of philosophy, theology, critical theory, and postdigital studies. The article reveals complex and nuanced relationships between various disciplinary perspectives, religions, and political positions, and points towards lot of commonalities between their views to the enchantment, disenchantment, re-enchantment continuum. Some commonly discussed questions include: Where do the mythical, mystical and spiritual end and the rational, objective and empirical begin? How do we find our bearings in the midst of this complexity and where do we search for resources that are trustworthy and reliable? While the article inevitably offers more questions than answers, a common thread between all contributions is the need for an open postdigital dialogue conducted in the spirit of mutual understanding and respect. It is with this conclusion that the article offers a possible route for further development of such dialogue in the future.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	934-965
Number of pages	32
Journal	Postdigital Science and Education
Volume	3
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4
Publication status	Published - Oct 2021
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Christianity
Collective Research
Dialogue
Disenchantment
Enchantment
Islam
Philosophy
Postdigital
Re-Enchantment
Religion
Science

Access to Document

10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

Cite this

Reader, J., Jandrić, P., Peters, M. A., Barnett, R., Garbowski, M., Lipińska, V., Rider, S., Bhatt, I., Clarke, A., Hashemi, M., Bevan, A., Trozzo, E., MacKenzie, A., Aldern, J. J., Matias, C. E., Stewart, G. T., Mika, C., McLaren, P., Fawns, T., ... Baker, C. (2021). Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 934-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

@article{428b64e897a446248785b2e455fc8e8f,

title = "Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion",

abstract = "This collectively written article explores postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion within the continuum of enchantment, disenchantment, and re-enchantment. Contributions are broadly classified within four sections related to academic fields of philosophy, theology, critical theory, and postdigital studies. The article reveals complex and nuanced relationships between various disciplinary perspectives, religions, and political positions, and points towards lot of commonalities between their views to the enchantment, disenchantment, re-enchantment continuum. Some commonly discussed questions include: Where do the mythical, mystical and spiritual end and the rational, objective and empirical begin? How do we find our bearings in the midst of this complexity and where do we search for resources that are trustworthy and reliable? While the article inevitably offers more questions than answers, a common thread between all contributions is the need for an open postdigital dialogue conducted in the spirit of mutual understanding and respect. It is with this conclusion that the article offers a possible route for further development of such dialogue in the future.",

keywords = "Christianity, Collective Research, Dialogue, Disenchantment, Enchantment, Islam, Philosophy, Postdigital, Re-Enchantment, Religion, Science",

author = "John Reader and Petar Jandri{\'c} and Peters, {Michael A.} and Ronald Barnett and Marcin Garbowski and Veronika Lipi{\'n}ska and Sharon Rider and Ibrar Bhatt and Abdassamad Clarke and Morteza Hashemi and Andrew Bevan and Eric Trozzo and Alison MacKenzie and Aldern, {Jared J.} and Matias, {Cheryl E.} and Stewart, {Georgina Tuari} and Carl Mika and Peter McLaren and Tim Fawns and Jeremy Knox and Maggi Savin-Baden and Liz Jackson and Nina Hood and Marek Tesar and Steve Fuller and Chris Baker",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "934--965",

journal = "Postdigital Science and Education",

issn = "2524-4868",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "3",

}

Reader, J, Jandrić, P, Peters, MA, Barnett, R, Garbowski, M, Lipińska, V, Rider, S, Bhatt, I, Clarke, A, Hashemi, M, Bevan, A, Trozzo, E, MacKenzie, A, Aldern, JJ, Matias, CE, Stewart, GT, Mika, C, McLaren, P, Fawns, T, Knox, J, Savin-Baden, M, Jackson, L, Hood, N, Tesar, M, Fuller, S & Baker, C 2021, 'Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion', Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 934-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment

T2 - postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion

AU - Reader, John

AU - Jandrić, Petar

AU - Peters, Michael A.

AU - Barnett, Ronald

AU - Garbowski, Marcin

AU - Lipińska, Veronika

AU - Rider, Sharon

AU - Bhatt, Ibrar

AU - Clarke, Abdassamad

AU - Hashemi, Morteza

AU - Bevan, Andrew

AU - Trozzo, Eric

AU - MacKenzie, Alison

AU - Aldern, Jared J.

AU - Matias, Cheryl E.

AU - Stewart, Georgina Tuari

AU - Mika, Carl

AU - McLaren, Peter

AU - Fawns, Tim

AU - Knox, Jeremy

AU - Savin-Baden, Maggi

AU - Jackson, Liz

AU - Hood, Nina

AU - Tesar, Marek

AU - Fuller, Steve

AU - Baker, Chris

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - This collectively written article explores postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion within the continuum of enchantment, disenchantment, and re-enchantment. Contributions are broadly classified within four sections related to academic fields of philosophy, theology, critical theory, and postdigital studies. The article reveals complex and nuanced relationships between various disciplinary perspectives, religions, and political positions, and points towards lot of commonalities between their views to the enchantment, disenchantment, re-enchantment continuum. Some commonly discussed questions include: Where do the mythical, mystical and spiritual end and the rational, objective and empirical begin? How do we find our bearings in the midst of this complexity and where do we search for resources that are trustworthy and reliable? While the article inevitably offers more questions than answers, a common thread between all contributions is the need for an open postdigital dialogue conducted in the spirit of mutual understanding and respect. It is with this conclusion that the article offers a possible route for further development of such dialogue in the future.

AB - This collectively written article explores postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion within the continuum of enchantment, disenchantment, and re-enchantment. Contributions are broadly classified within four sections related to academic fields of philosophy, theology, critical theory, and postdigital studies. The article reveals complex and nuanced relationships between various disciplinary perspectives, religions, and political positions, and points towards lot of commonalities between their views to the enchantment, disenchantment, re-enchantment continuum. Some commonly discussed questions include: Where do the mythical, mystical and spiritual end and the rational, objective and empirical begin? How do we find our bearings in the midst of this complexity and where do we search for resources that are trustworthy and reliable? While the article inevitably offers more questions than answers, a common thread between all contributions is the need for an open postdigital dialogue conducted in the spirit of mutual understanding and respect. It is with this conclusion that the article offers a possible route for further development of such dialogue in the future.

KW - Christianity

KW - Collective Research

KW - Dialogue

KW - Disenchantment

KW - Enchantment

KW - Islam

KW - Philosophy

KW - Postdigital

KW - Re-Enchantment

KW - Religion

KW - Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124746268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

DO - 10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85124746268

SN - 2524-4868

VL - 3

SP - 934

EP - 965

JO - Postdigital Science and Education

JF - Postdigital Science and Education

IS - 3

ER -

Enchantment - disenchantment-re-enchantment: postdigital relationships between science, philosophy, and religion

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this