Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The emergence of personalised data technologies such as learning analytics is framed as a solution to manage the needs of higher education student populations that are growing ever more diverse and larger in size. However, the current approach to learning analytics presents tensions between increasing student agency in making learning-related decisions and ‘datafying’ students in the process of collecting, analysing and interpreting data. This article presents a study that explores staff and student experience of agency, equity and transparency in existing data practices and expectations towards learning analytics in a UK university. The results show a number of intertwined factors that have contributed to the tensions between enhancing a learner’s control of their studies and, at the same time, diminishing their autonomy as an active agent in the process of learning analytics. This article argues that learner empowerment should not be automatically assumed to have taken place as part of the adoption of learning analytics. Instead, the interwoven power relationships in a complex educational system and the interactions between humans and machines need to be taken into consideration when presenting learning analytics as an equitable process to enhance student agency and educational equity.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Keywords

  • agency
  • equity
  • Learning analytics
  • transparency

Cite this

@article{def097da572a4ca1bffd5299a1893126,
title = "Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics",
abstract = "The emergence of personalised data technologies such as learning analytics is framed as a solution to manage the needs of higher education student populations that are growing ever more diverse and larger in size. However, the current approach to learning analytics presents tensions between increasing student agency in making learning-related decisions and ‘datafying’ students in the process of collecting, analysing and interpreting data. This article presents a study that explores staff and student experience of agency, equity and transparency in existing data practices and expectations towards learning analytics in a UK university. The results show a number of intertwined factors that have contributed to the tensions between enhancing a learner’s control of their studies and, at the same time, diminishing their autonomy as an active agent in the process of learning analytics. This article argues that learner empowerment should not be automatically assumed to have taken place as part of the adoption of learning analytics. Instead, the interwoven power relationships in a complex educational system and the interactions between humans and machines need to be taken into consideration when presenting learning analytics as an equitable process to enhance student agency and educational equity.",
keywords = "agency, equity, Learning analytics, transparency",
author = "Yi-Shan Tsai and Carlo Perrotta and Dragan Gašević",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396",
language = "English",
journal = "Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics

AU - Tsai, Yi-Shan

AU - Perrotta, Carlo

AU - Gašević, Dragan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The emergence of personalised data technologies such as learning analytics is framed as a solution to manage the needs of higher education student populations that are growing ever more diverse and larger in size. However, the current approach to learning analytics presents tensions between increasing student agency in making learning-related decisions and ‘datafying’ students in the process of collecting, analysing and interpreting data. This article presents a study that explores staff and student experience of agency, equity and transparency in existing data practices and expectations towards learning analytics in a UK university. The results show a number of intertwined factors that have contributed to the tensions between enhancing a learner’s control of their studies and, at the same time, diminishing their autonomy as an active agent in the process of learning analytics. This article argues that learner empowerment should not be automatically assumed to have taken place as part of the adoption of learning analytics. Instead, the interwoven power relationships in a complex educational system and the interactions between humans and machines need to be taken into consideration when presenting learning analytics as an equitable process to enhance student agency and educational equity.

AB - The emergence of personalised data technologies such as learning analytics is framed as a solution to manage the needs of higher education student populations that are growing ever more diverse and larger in size. However, the current approach to learning analytics presents tensions between increasing student agency in making learning-related decisions and ‘datafying’ students in the process of collecting, analysing and interpreting data. This article presents a study that explores staff and student experience of agency, equity and transparency in existing data practices and expectations towards learning analytics in a UK university. The results show a number of intertwined factors that have contributed to the tensions between enhancing a learner’s control of their studies and, at the same time, diminishing their autonomy as an active agent in the process of learning analytics. This article argues that learner empowerment should not be automatically assumed to have taken place as part of the adoption of learning analytics. Instead, the interwoven power relationships in a complex educational system and the interactions between humans and machines need to be taken into consideration when presenting learning analytics as an equitable process to enhance student agency and educational equity.

KW - agency

KW - equity

KW - Learning analytics

KW - transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075451634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075451634

JO - Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

ER -