Empirical study of employment arrangements and precariousness in Australia

Amber Louie, Aleck Ostry, M Quinlan, Tessa Keegel, Jean Shoveller, Anthony LaMontagne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)


Much research on precarious employment compares permanent workers with one or two other broadly-defined employment categories. We developed a more refined method of examining precariousness by defining current employment arrangements in terms of job characteristics. These employment arrangement categories were then compared in terms of socio-demographics and self-reported job insecurity. This investigation was based on a cross-sectional population-based survey of a random sample of 1,101 working Australians. Eight mutually exclusive employment categories were identified: Permanent Full-time (46.4 ), Permanent Part-time (18.3 ), Casual Full-time (2.7 ), Casual Part-time (9.3 ), Fixed Term Contract (2.1 ), Labour Hire (3.6 ), Own Account Self-employed (7.4 ), and Other Self-employed (9.5 ). These showed significant and coherent differences in job characteristics, socio-demographics and perceived job insecurity. These empirically-supported categories may provide a conceptual guide for government agencies, policy makers and researchers in areas including occupational health and safety, taxation, labour market regulations, the working poor, child poverty, benefit programs, industrial relations, and skills development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465 - 489
Number of pages25
JournalIndustrial Relations
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Cite this

Louie, A., Ostry, A., Quinlan, M., Keegel, T., Shoveller, J., & LaMontagne, A. (2006). Empirical study of employment arrangements and precariousness in Australia. Industrial Relations, 61(3), 465 - 489.