Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures

Gang Chen, Julie Ratcliffe, Billingsley Kaambwa, Nikki McCaffrey, Jeff Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure (ICECAP) is a new preference-based measure of the extent to which a person is able to achieve attributes or capabilities related to the quality of life. Conceptually, it differs from health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the focus is upon the ability or capacity to achieve as distinct from the current experience of the attributes. The objective of this study was to explore the empirical relationships between capability as assessed by the ICECAP for Adults (ICECAP-A) and HRQoL as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D and the five-level EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). To compare these measures, the study employed self-reported survey data from the healthy public and from seven disease areas in five countries. Results indicate that, despite their conceptual origins, the ICECAP-A is strongly associated with the AQoL-8D and that the clear distinction between capabilities and HRQoL found in other studies is attributable to the use of the EQ-5D in the comparison and the weaker association between the EQ-5D and ICECAP-A. The suggestion that ICECAP-A should be included in evaluation studies along with a HRQoL instrument is more persuasive when the instrument is the EQ-5D. The case for its inclusion with other HRQoL instruments requires further research and evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-190
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume140
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • AQoL-8D
  • Capability
  • EQ-5D-5L
  • ICECAP-A
  • Quality of life

Cite this

Chen, Gang ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Kaambwa, Billingsley ; McCaffrey, Nikki ; Richardson, Jeff. / Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures. In: Social Indicators Research. 2018 ; Vol. 140, No. 1. pp. 175-190.
@article{1bd8a03bb9e441fd846a505361b90f15,
title = "Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures",
abstract = "The Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure (ICECAP) is a new preference-based measure of the extent to which a person is able to achieve attributes or capabilities related to the quality of life. Conceptually, it differs from health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the focus is upon the ability or capacity to achieve as distinct from the current experience of the attributes. The objective of this study was to explore the empirical relationships between capability as assessed by the ICECAP for Adults (ICECAP-A) and HRQoL as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D and the five-level EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). To compare these measures, the study employed self-reported survey data from the healthy public and from seven disease areas in five countries. Results indicate that, despite their conceptual origins, the ICECAP-A is strongly associated with the AQoL-8D and that the clear distinction between capabilities and HRQoL found in other studies is attributable to the use of the EQ-5D in the comparison and the weaker association between the EQ-5D and ICECAP-A. The suggestion that ICECAP-A should be included in evaluation studies along with a HRQoL instrument is more persuasive when the instrument is the EQ-5D. The case for its inclusion with other HRQoL instruments requires further research and evaluation.",
keywords = "AQoL-8D, Capability, EQ-5D-5L, ICECAP-A, Quality of life",
author = "Gang Chen and Julie Ratcliffe and Billingsley Kaambwa and Nikki McCaffrey and Jeff Richardson",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-017-1788-9",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "175--190",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures. / Chen, Gang; Ratcliffe, Julie; Kaambwa, Billingsley; McCaffrey, Nikki; Richardson, Jeff.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 140, No. 1, 11.2018, p. 175-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures

AU - Chen, Gang

AU - Ratcliffe, Julie

AU - Kaambwa, Billingsley

AU - McCaffrey, Nikki

AU - Richardson, Jeff

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - The Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure (ICECAP) is a new preference-based measure of the extent to which a person is able to achieve attributes or capabilities related to the quality of life. Conceptually, it differs from health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the focus is upon the ability or capacity to achieve as distinct from the current experience of the attributes. The objective of this study was to explore the empirical relationships between capability as assessed by the ICECAP for Adults (ICECAP-A) and HRQoL as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D and the five-level EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). To compare these measures, the study employed self-reported survey data from the healthy public and from seven disease areas in five countries. Results indicate that, despite their conceptual origins, the ICECAP-A is strongly associated with the AQoL-8D and that the clear distinction between capabilities and HRQoL found in other studies is attributable to the use of the EQ-5D in the comparison and the weaker association between the EQ-5D and ICECAP-A. The suggestion that ICECAP-A should be included in evaluation studies along with a HRQoL instrument is more persuasive when the instrument is the EQ-5D. The case for its inclusion with other HRQoL instruments requires further research and evaluation.

AB - The Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure (ICECAP) is a new preference-based measure of the extent to which a person is able to achieve attributes or capabilities related to the quality of life. Conceptually, it differs from health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the focus is upon the ability or capacity to achieve as distinct from the current experience of the attributes. The objective of this study was to explore the empirical relationships between capability as assessed by the ICECAP for Adults (ICECAP-A) and HRQoL as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D and the five-level EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). To compare these measures, the study employed self-reported survey data from the healthy public and from seven disease areas in five countries. Results indicate that, despite their conceptual origins, the ICECAP-A is strongly associated with the AQoL-8D and that the clear distinction between capabilities and HRQoL found in other studies is attributable to the use of the EQ-5D in the comparison and the weaker association between the EQ-5D and ICECAP-A. The suggestion that ICECAP-A should be included in evaluation studies along with a HRQoL instrument is more persuasive when the instrument is the EQ-5D. The case for its inclusion with other HRQoL instruments requires further research and evaluation.

KW - AQoL-8D

KW - Capability

KW - EQ-5D-5L

KW - ICECAP-A

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032798600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-017-1788-9

DO - 10.1007/s11205-017-1788-9

M3 - Article

VL - 140

SP - 175

EP - 190

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 1

ER -