Empires and protection: Making interpolity law in the early modern world

Lauren Benton, Adam Clulow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

References to protection were ubiquitous across the early modern world, featuring in a range of transactions between polities in very different regions. And yet discourses about protection retained a quality of imprecision that makes it difficult to pin down precise legal statuses and responsibilities. It was often unclear who was protecting whom or the exact nature of the relationship. In this article, we interrogate standard distinctions about the dual character of protection that differentiate between 'inside' protection of subjects and 'outside' protection of allies and other external groups. Rather than a clear division, we find a blurring of lines, with many protection claims creatively combining 'inside' and 'outside' protection. We argue that the juxtaposition of these 'inside' and 'outside' meanings of protection underpinned the formation of irregular, interpenetrating zones of imperial suzerainty in crowded maritime arenas and conflict-ridden borderlands across the early modern world.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-92
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Global History
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • borderlands
  • empire
  • international law
  • piracy
  • protection

Cite this