TY - JOUR
T1 - Emergency Department Escalation in Theory and Practice
T2 - A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Model of Organizational Resilience
AU - Back, Jonathan
AU - Ross, Alastair J.
AU - Duncan, Myanna D.
AU - Jaye, Peter
AU - Henderson, Katherine
AU - Anderson, Janet E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Study objective Escalation policies are used by emergency departments (EDs) when responding to an increase in demand (eg, a sudden inflow of patients) or a reduction in capacity (eg, a lack of beds to admit patients). The policies aim to maintain the ability to deliver patient care, without compromising safety, by modifying “normal” processes. The study objective is to examine escalation policies in theory and practice. Methods This was a mixed-method study involving a conceptual analysis of National Health Service escalation policies (n=12) and associated escalation actions (n=92), as well as a detailed ethnographic study of escalation in situ during a 16-month period in a large UK ED (n=30 observations). Results The conceptual analysis of National Health Service escalation policies found that their use requires the ability to dynamically reconfigure resources (staff and equipment), change work flow, and relocate patients. In practice, it was discovered that when the ED is under pressure, these prerequisites cannot always be attained. Instead, escalation processes were adapted to manage pressures informally. This adaptive need (“work as done”) was found to be incompletely specified in policies (“work as imagined”). Conclusion Formal escalation actions and their implementation in practice differed and varied in their effectiveness. Monitoring how escalation works in practice is essential in understanding whether and how escalation policies help to manage workload.
AB - Study objective Escalation policies are used by emergency departments (EDs) when responding to an increase in demand (eg, a sudden inflow of patients) or a reduction in capacity (eg, a lack of beds to admit patients). The policies aim to maintain the ability to deliver patient care, without compromising safety, by modifying “normal” processes. The study objective is to examine escalation policies in theory and practice. Methods This was a mixed-method study involving a conceptual analysis of National Health Service escalation policies (n=12) and associated escalation actions (n=92), as well as a detailed ethnographic study of escalation in situ during a 16-month period in a large UK ED (n=30 observations). Results The conceptual analysis of National Health Service escalation policies found that their use requires the ability to dynamically reconfigure resources (staff and equipment), change work flow, and relocate patients. In practice, it was discovered that when the ED is under pressure, these prerequisites cannot always be attained. Instead, escalation processes were adapted to manage pressures informally. This adaptive need (“work as done”) was found to be incompletely specified in policies (“work as imagined”). Conclusion Formal escalation actions and their implementation in practice differed and varied in their effectiveness. Monitoring how escalation works in practice is essential in understanding whether and how escalation policies help to manage workload.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021760332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.032
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 28662909
AN - SCOPUS:85021760332
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 70
SP - 659
EP - 671
JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine
JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine
IS - 5
ER -