Emblematic violence and aetiological cul-de-sacs: On the discourse of 'one-punch' (non) fatalities

Asher Leigh Gevaux Flynn, Mark Halsey, Murray Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

With well over 90 one-punch fatalities in the past decade, Australia likely holds the dubious honour of being at the epicentre of such incidents. In this article, we argue that political and legal responses to one-punch violence have been based on fairly cursory understandings of why these events occur. By way of contrast, we suggest that one-punch fatalities (and non-fatalities) are emblematic of deeper undercurrents of antisocial conduct and dispositions in late modern Australian life. In an effort to break open the discursive limits of one-punch violence, we briefly engage with perpetrator narratives - the missing voice in these debates. Such engagement, we argue, is key to developing a more nuanced understanding of why male on male violence continues to be a major issue of sociocultural concern.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179 - 195
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

@article{a0fb89c991354a52b5399710b771a958,
title = "Emblematic violence and aetiological cul-de-sacs: On the discourse of 'one-punch' (non) fatalities",
abstract = "With well over 90 one-punch fatalities in the past decade, Australia likely holds the dubious honour of being at the epicentre of such incidents. In this article, we argue that political and legal responses to one-punch violence have been based on fairly cursory understandings of why these events occur. By way of contrast, we suggest that one-punch fatalities (and non-fatalities) are emblematic of deeper undercurrents of antisocial conduct and dispositions in late modern Australian life. In an effort to break open the discursive limits of one-punch violence, we briefly engage with perpetrator narratives - the missing voice in these debates. Such engagement, we argue, is key to developing a more nuanced understanding of why male on male violence continues to be a major issue of sociocultural concern.",
author = "Flynn, {Asher Leigh Gevaux} and Mark Halsey and Murray Lee",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/bjc/azv039",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "179 -- 195",
journal = "British Journal of Criminology",
issn = "0007-0955",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Emblematic violence and aetiological cul-de-sacs: On the discourse of 'one-punch' (non) fatalities. / Flynn, Asher Leigh Gevaux; Halsey, Mark; Lee, Murray.

In: British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 56, 2016, p. 179 - 195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emblematic violence and aetiological cul-de-sacs: On the discourse of 'one-punch' (non) fatalities

AU - Flynn, Asher Leigh Gevaux

AU - Halsey, Mark

AU - Lee, Murray

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - With well over 90 one-punch fatalities in the past decade, Australia likely holds the dubious honour of being at the epicentre of such incidents. In this article, we argue that political and legal responses to one-punch violence have been based on fairly cursory understandings of why these events occur. By way of contrast, we suggest that one-punch fatalities (and non-fatalities) are emblematic of deeper undercurrents of antisocial conduct and dispositions in late modern Australian life. In an effort to break open the discursive limits of one-punch violence, we briefly engage with perpetrator narratives - the missing voice in these debates. Such engagement, we argue, is key to developing a more nuanced understanding of why male on male violence continues to be a major issue of sociocultural concern.

AB - With well over 90 one-punch fatalities in the past decade, Australia likely holds the dubious honour of being at the epicentre of such incidents. In this article, we argue that political and legal responses to one-punch violence have been based on fairly cursory understandings of why these events occur. By way of contrast, we suggest that one-punch fatalities (and non-fatalities) are emblematic of deeper undercurrents of antisocial conduct and dispositions in late modern Australian life. In an effort to break open the discursive limits of one-punch violence, we briefly engage with perpetrator narratives - the missing voice in these debates. Such engagement, we argue, is key to developing a more nuanced understanding of why male on male violence continues to be a major issue of sociocultural concern.

UR - http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/56/1/179.full.pdf+html

U2 - 10.1093/bjc/azv039

DO - 10.1093/bjc/azv039

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 179

EP - 195

JO - British Journal of Criminology

JF - British Journal of Criminology

SN - 0007-0955

ER -