Abstract
Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Fleurbaey have developed a novel theory of distributive ethics, which incorporates a concern for inequality in both outcomes and life chances. This article demonstrates that their attempt to measure life chances is problematic for two reasons. First, it cannot be generalized to variable population cases without inheriting the problems of average utilitarianism. Second, it does not consistently respect the very ideas that were used to motivate the proposal.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 603-611 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Ethics |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver