TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for the treatment of low-renin hypertension
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Shah, Sonali S.
AU - Zhang, Jinghong
AU - Gwini, Stella May
AU - Young, Morag J.
AU - Fuller, Peter J.
AU - Yang, Jun
N1 - Funding Information:
SSS is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) postgraduate scholarship (APP2013946). MJY is supported by the Alice Baker and Eleanor Shaw Gender Equity Fellowship. JY is supported by project funding from an NHMRC investigator grant (APP1194576). The Hudson Institute of Research is supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Scheme. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s).
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death. The optimal treatment of low-renin hypertension (LRH), present in 30% of hypertensive individuals, is not known. LRH likely reflects a state of excess salt, expanded volume and/or mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Therefore, targeted treatment with MR antagonists (MRA) may be beneficial. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of MRA therapy in LRH. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of adults with LRH that compared the efficacy of MRA to placebo or other antihypertensive treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the difference in blood pressure and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022318763). From the 1612 records identified, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 1043 participants. Seven studies (n = 345) were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis indicated that MRA reduced systolic blood pressure by −6.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval −9.6 to −4.1) and −4.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval −11.9 to 2.4) compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) and diuretics. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as moderate and very low, respectively. The findings of this systematic review suggest that MRA is effective in lowering blood pressure in LRH and may be better than ACEi/ARB. Translation to clinical practice is limited by the uncertainty of evidence.
AB - Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death. The optimal treatment of low-renin hypertension (LRH), present in 30% of hypertensive individuals, is not known. LRH likely reflects a state of excess salt, expanded volume and/or mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Therefore, targeted treatment with MR antagonists (MRA) may be beneficial. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of MRA therapy in LRH. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of adults with LRH that compared the efficacy of MRA to placebo or other antihypertensive treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the difference in blood pressure and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022318763). From the 1612 records identified, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 1043 participants. Seven studies (n = 345) were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis indicated that MRA reduced systolic blood pressure by −6.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval −9.6 to −4.1) and −4.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval −11.9 to 2.4) compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) and diuretics. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as moderate and very low, respectively. The findings of this systematic review suggest that MRA is effective in lowering blood pressure in LRH and may be better than ACEi/ARB. Translation to clinical practice is limited by the uncertainty of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182141873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41371-023-00891-1
DO - 10.1038/s41371-023-00891-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 38200100
AN - SCOPUS:85182141873
SN - 0950-9240
VL - 38
SP - 383
EP - 392
JO - Journal of Human Hypertension
JF - Journal of Human Hypertension
IS - 5
ER -