TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Performance during a Change Signal Task with Adaptive Dynamics
AU - Honn, Kimberly A.
AU - Morris, Megan B.
AU - Jackson, Melinda L.
AU - Van Dongen, Hans P.A.
AU - Gunzelmann, Glenn
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R01HL105768, by the Government under Other Transactions Number W81XWH-15-9-0001 (through The Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC)), and by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Warfighter Readiness Research Division. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official guidance or position of the United States Government, the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Air Force, or any of their subsidiaries or employees. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case number: AFRL-2023-2798.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Augmented cognition, which refers to real-time modifications to a human–system interface to improve performance and includes dynamic task environments with automated adaptations, can serve to protect against performance impairment under challenging work conditions. However, the effectiveness of augmented cognition as a countermeasure for performance impairment due to sleep loss is unknown. Here, in a controlled laboratory study, an adaptive version of a Change Signal task was administered repeatedly to healthy adults randomized to 62 h of total sleep deprivation (TSD) or a rested control condition. In the computerized task, a left- or right-facing arrow was presented to start each trial. In a subset of trials, a second arrow facing the opposite direction was presented after a delay. Subjects were to respond within 1000 ms of the trial start by pressing the arrow key corresponding to the single arrow (Go trials) or to the second arrow when present (Change trials). The Change Signal Delay (CSD)—i.e., the delay between the appearance of the first and second arrows—was shortened following incorrect responses and lengthened following correct responses so that subsequent Change trials became easier or harder, respectively. The task featured two distinct CSD dynamics, which produced relatively stable low and high error rates when subjects were rested (Low and High Error Likelihood trials, respectively). During TSD, the High Error Likelihood trials produced the same, relatively high error rate, but the Low Error Likelihood trials produced a higher error rate than in the rested condition. Thus, sleep loss altered the effectiveness of the adaptive dynamics in the Change Signal task. A principal component analysis revealed that while subjects varied in their performance of the task along a single dominant dimension when rested, a second inter-individual differences dimension emerged during TSD. These findings suggest a need for further investigation of the interaction between augmented cognition approaches and sleep deprivation in order to determine whether and how augmented cognition can be relied upon as a countermeasure to performance impairment in operational settings with sleep loss.
AB - Augmented cognition, which refers to real-time modifications to a human–system interface to improve performance and includes dynamic task environments with automated adaptations, can serve to protect against performance impairment under challenging work conditions. However, the effectiveness of augmented cognition as a countermeasure for performance impairment due to sleep loss is unknown. Here, in a controlled laboratory study, an adaptive version of a Change Signal task was administered repeatedly to healthy adults randomized to 62 h of total sleep deprivation (TSD) or a rested control condition. In the computerized task, a left- or right-facing arrow was presented to start each trial. In a subset of trials, a second arrow facing the opposite direction was presented after a delay. Subjects were to respond within 1000 ms of the trial start by pressing the arrow key corresponding to the single arrow (Go trials) or to the second arrow when present (Change trials). The Change Signal Delay (CSD)—i.e., the delay between the appearance of the first and second arrows—was shortened following incorrect responses and lengthened following correct responses so that subsequent Change trials became easier or harder, respectively. The task featured two distinct CSD dynamics, which produced relatively stable low and high error rates when subjects were rested (Low and High Error Likelihood trials, respectively). During TSD, the High Error Likelihood trials produced the same, relatively high error rate, but the Low Error Likelihood trials produced a higher error rate than in the rested condition. Thus, sleep loss altered the effectiveness of the adaptive dynamics in the Change Signal task. A principal component analysis revealed that while subjects varied in their performance of the task along a single dominant dimension when rested, a second inter-individual differences dimension emerged during TSD. These findings suggest a need for further investigation of the interaction between augmented cognition approaches and sleep deprivation in order to determine whether and how augmented cognition can be relied upon as a countermeasure to performance impairment in operational settings with sleep loss.
KW - augmented cognition
KW - cognitive functioning
KW - executive functions
KW - inter-individual differences
KW - response deadline
KW - response time
KW - sleep loss
KW - task performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166393941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/brainsci13071062
DO - 10.3390/brainsci13071062
M3 - Article
C2 - 37508994
AN - SCOPUS:85166393941
SN - 2076-3425
VL - 13
JO - Brain Sciences
JF - Brain Sciences
IS - 7
M1 - 1062
ER -