Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation

C. Bibiano; Y. S. Chiew; D. Redmond; J. Kretschmer; P. D. Docherty; J. G. Chase; K. Möller

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation

C. Bibiano, Y. S. Chiew, D. Redmond, J. Kretschmer, P. D. Docherty, J. G. Chase, K. Möller

Malaysia School of Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › Other

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of mechanical ventilation (MV) is to provide sufficient breathing support for patients with respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, applying inappropriate ventilation parameters can result in ventilator induced lung injury. To prevent this, respiratory mechanics such as elastance and resistance can be estimated at the bedside to help guide MV parameters using respiratory mechanics models. Different models or methods provide different information and each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, respiratory mechanics of 9 respiratory failure patients were estimated using the simple first order model (FOM) and viscoelastic model (VEM). These patients undergo different respiratory manoeuvres and their estimated respiratory mechanics using these models are studied and compared with a standard clinical method in estimating respiratory mechanics. The results showed that both models were able to capture patient-specific mechanics and responses. The VEM was able to provide higher correlation to the standard clinical method compared to FOM.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016
Editors	Efthyvoulos Kyriacou, Stelios Christofides, Constantinos S. Pattichis
Publisher	Springer
Pages	50-55
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Print)	9783319327013
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11
Publication status	Published - 2016
Event	Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016 - Paphos, Cyprus Duration: 31 Mar 2016 → 2 Apr 2016 Conference number: 14th https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7 (Proceedings)

Publication series

Name	IFMBE Proceedings
Volume	57
ISSN (Print)	1680-0737

Conference

Conference	Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016
Abbreviated title	MEDICON 2016
Country/Territory	Cyprus
City	Paphos
Period	31/03/16 → 2/04/16
Internet address	https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7 (Proceedings)

Keywords

Elastance
First Order Model
Parameter Identification
Respiratory Mechanics
Viscoelastic Model

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

Cite this

Bibiano, C., Chiew, Y. S., Redmond, D., Kretschmer, J., Docherty, P. D., Chase, J. G., & Möller, K. (2016). Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation. In E. Kyriacou, S. Christofides, & C. S. Pattichis (Eds.), XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016 (pp. 50-55). (IFMBE Proceedings; Vol. 57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

Bibiano, C. ; Chiew, Y. S. ; Redmond, D. et al. / Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation. XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016. editor / Efthyvoulos Kyriacou ; Stelios Christofides ; Constantinos S. Pattichis. Springer, 2016. pp. 50-55 (IFMBE Proceedings).

@inproceedings{b81fa1010a284e419998defc389ebff9,

title = "Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation",

abstract = "The aim of mechanical ventilation (MV) is to provide sufficient breathing support for patients with respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, applying inappropriate ventilation parameters can result in ventilator induced lung injury. To prevent this, respiratory mechanics such as elastance and resistance can be estimated at the bedside to help guide MV parameters using respiratory mechanics models. Different models or methods provide different information and each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, respiratory mechanics of 9 respiratory failure patients were estimated using the simple first order model (FOM) and viscoelastic model (VEM). These patients undergo different respiratory manoeuvres and their estimated respiratory mechanics using these models are studied and compared with a standard clinical method in estimating respiratory mechanics. The results showed that both models were able to capture patient-specific mechanics and responses. The VEM was able to provide higher correlation to the standard clinical method compared to FOM.",

keywords = "Elastance, First Order Model, Parameter Identification, Respiratory Mechanics, Viscoelastic Model",

author = "C. Bibiano and Chiew, {Y. S.} and D. Redmond and J. Kretschmer and Docherty, {P. D.} and Chase, {J. G.} and K. M{\"o}ller",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016, MEDICON 2016 ; Conference date: 31-03-2016 Through 02-04-2016",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319327013",

series = "IFMBE Proceedings",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "50--55",

editor = "Efthyvoulos Kyriacou and Stelios Christofides and Pattichis, {Constantinos S.}",

booktitle = "XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016",

url = "https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7",

}

Bibiano, C, Chiew, YS, Redmond, D, Kretschmer, J, Docherty, PD, Chase, JG & Möller, K 2016, Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation. in E Kyriacou, S Christofides & CS Pattichis (eds), XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 57, Springer, pp. 50-55, Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016, Paphos, Cyprus, 31/03/16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation. / Bibiano, C.; Chiew, Y. S.; Redmond, D. et al.
XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016. ed. / Efthyvoulos Kyriacou; Stelios Christofides; Constantinos S. Pattichis. Springer, 2016. p. 50-55 (IFMBE Proceedings; Vol. 57).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › Other

TY - GEN

T1 - Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation

AU - Bibiano, C.

AU - Chiew, Y. S.

AU - Redmond, D.

AU - Kretschmer, J.

AU - Docherty, P. D.

AU - Chase, J. G.

AU - Möller, K.

N1 - Conference code: 14th

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The aim of mechanical ventilation (MV) is to provide sufficient breathing support for patients with respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, applying inappropriate ventilation parameters can result in ventilator induced lung injury. To prevent this, respiratory mechanics such as elastance and resistance can be estimated at the bedside to help guide MV parameters using respiratory mechanics models. Different models or methods provide different information and each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, respiratory mechanics of 9 respiratory failure patients were estimated using the simple first order model (FOM) and viscoelastic model (VEM). These patients undergo different respiratory manoeuvres and their estimated respiratory mechanics using these models are studied and compared with a standard clinical method in estimating respiratory mechanics. The results showed that both models were able to capture patient-specific mechanics and responses. The VEM was able to provide higher correlation to the standard clinical method compared to FOM.

AB - The aim of mechanical ventilation (MV) is to provide sufficient breathing support for patients with respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, applying inappropriate ventilation parameters can result in ventilator induced lung injury. To prevent this, respiratory mechanics such as elastance and resistance can be estimated at the bedside to help guide MV parameters using respiratory mechanics models. Different models or methods provide different information and each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, respiratory mechanics of 9 respiratory failure patients were estimated using the simple first order model (FOM) and viscoelastic model (VEM). These patients undergo different respiratory manoeuvres and their estimated respiratory mechanics using these models are studied and compared with a standard clinical method in estimating respiratory mechanics. The results showed that both models were able to capture patient-specific mechanics and responses. The VEM was able to provide higher correlation to the standard clinical method compared to FOM.

KW - Elastance

KW - First Order Model

KW - Parameter Identification

KW - Respiratory Mechanics

KW - Viscoelastic Model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968547417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

M3 - Conference Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84968547417

SN - 9783319327013

T3 - IFMBE Proceedings

SP - 50

EP - 55

BT - XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016

A2 - Kyriacou, Efthyvoulos

A2 - Christofides, Stelios

A2 - Pattichis, Constantinos S.

PB - Springer

T2 - Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016

Y2 - 31 March 2016 through 2 April 2016

ER -

Bibiano C, Chiew YS, Redmond D, Kretschmer J, Docherty PD, Chase JG et al. Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation. In Kyriacou E, Christofides S, Pattichis CS, editors, XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, MEDICON 2016. Springer. 2016. p. 50-55. (IFMBE Proceedings). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_11

Effects of different models and different respiratory manoeuvres in respiratory mechanics estimation

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this