TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of canagliflozin compared with placebo on major adverse cardiovascular and kidney events in patient groups with different baseline levels of HbA1c, disease duration and treatment intensity
T2 - results from the CANVAS Program
AU - Young, Tamara K.
AU - Li, Jing Wei
AU - Kang, Amy
AU - Heerspink, Hiddo J.L.
AU - Hockham, Carinna
AU - Arnott, Clare
AU - Neuen, Brendon L.
AU - Zoungas, Sophia
AU - Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
AU - Perkovic, Vlado
AU - de Zeeuw, Dick
AU - Fulcher, Greg
AU - Neal, Bruce
AU - Jardine, Meg
N1 - Funding Information:
TKY is supported by a University Postgraduate Award Scholarship to undertake a PhD at UNSW. She provides scientific support for a trial sponsored by Visterra. J-WL, AK, CA, CH and GF declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work. BLN has received travel support from Janssen and honoraria from Bayer with all funds paid to his institution. HJLH’s institution received honoraria from Janssen. SZ reports payment to institution (Monash University) outside the submitted work—Eli Lilly Australia Ltd., Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD Australia, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk and Servier. KWM has received research grants or consultancy agreements from the following: Abbott, Afferent, AHA, Amgen, Anthos, Apple, Inc., AstraZeneca, Baim Institute, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiva Medical, Inc., CSL Behring, Eidos, Elsevier, Ferring, Gilead, Google (Verily), Inova, Intermountain Health, Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold, Medscape, Medtronic, Merck, Mount Sinai, Mundipharma, Myokardia, NIH, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Portola, Regeneron, Sanifit, Sanofi, SmartMedics, St. Jude and Theravance. VP reports Honoraria for Advisory Boards or Scientific Presentations: AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Pfizer; Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chinook, Durect, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmalink, Relypsa, Retrophin, Roche, Sanofi, Servier and Vitae; and is Serving/Served on Steering Committees for trials funded by AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chinook, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Retrophin; and is a Board Director for: George Clinical, George Institute, Garvan Institute, Mindgardens Network, Children’s Cancer Institute and Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute. DdZ provides consultancy to Janssen Fresenius, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mundipharma and Travere Pharma. BLN reports honoraria from Janssen and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. MJ is supported by a Medical Research Future Fund Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program Career Development Fellowship; is responsible for research projects that have received unrestricted funding from Gambro, Baxter, CSL, Amgen, Eli Lilly and MSD; has served on advisory boards sponsored by Akebia, Astra Zeneca, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Vifor; serves on a Steering Committee for trials sponsored by Janssen and CSL; and has spoken at scientific meetings sponsored by Janssen, Amgen, Roche and Vifor, with any consultancy, honoraria or travel support paid to her institution.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Aims/hypothesis: Type 2 diabetes mellitus can manifest over a broad clinical range, although there is no clear consensus on the categorisation of disease complexity. We assessed the effects of canagliflozin, compared with placebo, on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program over a range of type 2 diabetes mellitus complexity, defined separately by baseline intensity of treatment, duration of diabetes and glycaemic control. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the effects of canagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to baseline glucose-lowering treatments (0 or 1, 2 or 3+ non-insulin glucose-lowering treatments, or insulin-based treatment), duration of diabetes (<10, 10 to 16, >16 years) and HbA1c (≤53.0 mmol/mol [<7.0%], >53.0 to 58.5 mmol/mol [>7.0% to 7.5%], >58.5 to 63.9 mmol/mol [>7.5 to 8.0%], >63.9 to 69.4 mmol/mol [8.0% to 8.5%], >69.4 to 74.9 mmol/mol [>8.5 to 9.0%] or >74.9 mmol/mol [>9.0%]). We analysed additional secondary endpoints for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, including a combined kidney outcome of sustained 40% decline in eGFR, end-stage kidney disease or death due to kidney disease. We used Cox regression analyses and compared the constancy of HRs across subgroups by fitting an interaction term (p value for significance <0.05). Results: At study initiation, 5095 (50%) CANVAS Program participants were treated with insulin, 2100 (21%) had an HbA1c > 74.9 mmol/mol (9.0%) and the median duration of diabetes was 12.6 years (interquartile interval 8.0–18 years). Canagliflozin reduced MACE (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75, 0.97]) with no evidence that the benefit differed between subgroups defined by the number of glucose-lowering treatments, the duration of diabetes or baseline HbA1c (all p-heterogeneity >0.17). Canagliflozin reduced MACE in participants receiving insulin with no evidence that the benefit differed from other participants in the trial (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.72, 1.00]). Similar results were observed for other cardiovascular outcomes and for the combined kidney outcome (HR for combined kidney outcome 0.60 [95% CI 0.47, 0.77]), with all p-heterogeneity >0.37. Conclusions/interpretation: In people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk, there was no evidence that cardiovascular and renal protection with canagliflozin differed across subgroups defined by baseline treatment intensity, duration of diabetes or HbA1c. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
AB - Aims/hypothesis: Type 2 diabetes mellitus can manifest over a broad clinical range, although there is no clear consensus on the categorisation of disease complexity. We assessed the effects of canagliflozin, compared with placebo, on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program over a range of type 2 diabetes mellitus complexity, defined separately by baseline intensity of treatment, duration of diabetes and glycaemic control. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the effects of canagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to baseline glucose-lowering treatments (0 or 1, 2 or 3+ non-insulin glucose-lowering treatments, or insulin-based treatment), duration of diabetes (<10, 10 to 16, >16 years) and HbA1c (≤53.0 mmol/mol [<7.0%], >53.0 to 58.5 mmol/mol [>7.0% to 7.5%], >58.5 to 63.9 mmol/mol [>7.5 to 8.0%], >63.9 to 69.4 mmol/mol [8.0% to 8.5%], >69.4 to 74.9 mmol/mol [>8.5 to 9.0%] or >74.9 mmol/mol [>9.0%]). We analysed additional secondary endpoints for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, including a combined kidney outcome of sustained 40% decline in eGFR, end-stage kidney disease or death due to kidney disease. We used Cox regression analyses and compared the constancy of HRs across subgroups by fitting an interaction term (p value for significance <0.05). Results: At study initiation, 5095 (50%) CANVAS Program participants were treated with insulin, 2100 (21%) had an HbA1c > 74.9 mmol/mol (9.0%) and the median duration of diabetes was 12.6 years (interquartile interval 8.0–18 years). Canagliflozin reduced MACE (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75, 0.97]) with no evidence that the benefit differed between subgroups defined by the number of glucose-lowering treatments, the duration of diabetes or baseline HbA1c (all p-heterogeneity >0.17). Canagliflozin reduced MACE in participants receiving insulin with no evidence that the benefit differed from other participants in the trial (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.72, 1.00]). Similar results were observed for other cardiovascular outcomes and for the combined kidney outcome (HR for combined kidney outcome 0.60 [95% CI 0.47, 0.77]), with all p-heterogeneity >0.37. Conclusions/interpretation: In people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk, there was no evidence that cardiovascular and renal protection with canagliflozin differed across subgroups defined by baseline treatment intensity, duration of diabetes or HbA1c. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
KW - Baseline HbA
KW - Complications
KW - Disease duration
KW - Treatment intensity
KW - Type 2 diabetes complexity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113638265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00125-021-05524-1
DO - 10.1007/s00125-021-05524-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 34448033
AN - SCOPUS:85113638265
SN - 0012-186X
VL - 64
SP - 2402
EP - 2414
JO - Diabetologia
JF - Diabetologia
IS - 11
ER -