TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of weight management interventions for adults delivered in primary care
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
AU - Madigan, Claire D.
AU - Graham, Henrietta E.
AU - Sturgiss, Elizabeth
AU - Kettle, Victoria E.
AU - Gokal, Kajal
AU - Biddle, Greg
AU - Taylor, Gemma M.J.
AU - Daley, Amanda J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To examine the effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eligibility criteria for selection of studies: Randomised controlled trials of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with a body mass index ≥25 delivered in primary care compared with no treatment, attention control, or minimal intervention and weight change at ≥12 months follow-up. Data sources: Trials from a previous systematic review were extracted and the search completed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, and PsychINFO from 1 January 2018 to 19 August 2021. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with random effects models, and a pooled mean difference for both weight (kg) and waist circumference (cm) were calculated. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was weight change from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcome was weight change from baseline to ≥24 months. Change in waist circumference was assessed at 12 months. Results: 34 trials were included: 14 were additional, from a previous review. 27 trials (n=8000) were included in the primary outcome of weight change at 12 month follow-up. The mean difference between the intervention and comparator groups at 12 months was-2.3 kg (95% confidence interval-3.0 to-1.6 kg, I2=88%, P<0.001), favouring the intervention group. At ≥24 months (13 trials, n=5011) the mean difference in weight change was-1.8 kg (-2.8 to-0.8 kg, I2=88%, P<0.001) favouring the intervention. The mean difference in waist circumference (18 trials, n=5288) was-2.5 cm (-3.2 to-1.8 cm, I2=69%, P<0.001) in favour of the intervention at 12 months. Conclusions: Behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care are effective for weight loss and could be offered to members of the public. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021275529.
AB - Objective: To examine the effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eligibility criteria for selection of studies: Randomised controlled trials of behavioural weight management interventions for adults with a body mass index ≥25 delivered in primary care compared with no treatment, attention control, or minimal intervention and weight change at ≥12 months follow-up. Data sources: Trials from a previous systematic review were extracted and the search completed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, and PsychINFO from 1 January 2018 to 19 August 2021. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with random effects models, and a pooled mean difference for both weight (kg) and waist circumference (cm) were calculated. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was weight change from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcome was weight change from baseline to ≥24 months. Change in waist circumference was assessed at 12 months. Results: 34 trials were included: 14 were additional, from a previous review. 27 trials (n=8000) were included in the primary outcome of weight change at 12 month follow-up. The mean difference between the intervention and comparator groups at 12 months was-2.3 kg (95% confidence interval-3.0 to-1.6 kg, I2=88%, P<0.001), favouring the intervention group. At ≥24 months (13 trials, n=5011) the mean difference in weight change was-1.8 kg (-2.8 to-0.8 kg, I2=88%, P<0.001) favouring the intervention. The mean difference in waist circumference (18 trials, n=5288) was-2.5 cm (-3.2 to-1.8 cm, I2=69%, P<0.001) in favour of the intervention at 12 months. Conclusions: Behavioural weight management interventions for adults with obesity delivered in primary care are effective for weight loss and could be offered to members of the public. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021275529.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131216603
U2 - 10.1136/bmj-2021-069719
DO - 10.1136/bmj-2021-069719
M3 - Article
C2 - 35636762
AN - SCOPUS:85131216603
SN - 0959-535X
VL - 377
JO - BMJ
JF - BMJ
M1 - e069719
ER -