TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Exercise Capacity, Dyspnea, Fatigue, and Peripheral Muscle Strength in Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Oliveira, Murilo Rezende
AU - Hoffman, Mariana
AU - Jones, Arwel W.
AU - Holland, Anne E.
AU - Borghi-Silva, Audrey
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is supported by a research grant by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior- Brasil (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - 001) and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Objective: To establish the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. In addition, to compare the modalities of PR services (face-to-face and telerehabilitation) and the duration of PR in weeks (4-8 weeks and >8 weeks). Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), Central/Cochrane Library, SciELO Citation Index (Web of Science), and CINAHL. Study Selection: Studies determining the effects of PR in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome were included and grouped according to PR delivery modality. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by 2 reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1 (RoB-1). Data Synthesis: The literature search retrieved 1406 articles, of which 7 studies explored the effects of PR on patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome, with 188 patients randomized to PR. The mean age of participants was 50 years and 49% were women. Meta-analysis showed an increase in exercise capacity with PR compared with control (6-minute walking test: mean difference: 60.56 m, 95% confidence interval: 40.75–80.36), a reduction in fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale: -0.90, -1.49 to -0.31) but no change in dyspnea (-0.57, -1.32 to 0.17) and muscle strength (3.03, -1.89 to 7.96). There were no differences between telerehabilitation and face-to-face PR regarding effects on peripheral muscle strength (P=.42), dyspnea (P=.83), and fatigue (P=.34). There were no differences between programs 4-8 weeks and >8 weeks regarding exercise capacity (P=.83), peripheral muscle strength (P=.42), and dyspnea (P=.76). Conclusions: PR improves exercise capacity and reduces fatigue in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Duration of PR (4-8 weeks vs > 8 weeks) or PR modality (telerehabilitation vs face-to-face) did not affect outcomes but data were limited and based on subgroup analysis. Further evidence is required to determine the optimal delivery mode and duration of PR for post-COVID-19 syndrome.
AB - Objective: To establish the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. In addition, to compare the modalities of PR services (face-to-face and telerehabilitation) and the duration of PR in weeks (4-8 weeks and >8 weeks). Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), Central/Cochrane Library, SciELO Citation Index (Web of Science), and CINAHL. Study Selection: Studies determining the effects of PR in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome were included and grouped according to PR delivery modality. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by 2 reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1 (RoB-1). Data Synthesis: The literature search retrieved 1406 articles, of which 7 studies explored the effects of PR on patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome, with 188 patients randomized to PR. The mean age of participants was 50 years and 49% were women. Meta-analysis showed an increase in exercise capacity with PR compared with control (6-minute walking test: mean difference: 60.56 m, 95% confidence interval: 40.75–80.36), a reduction in fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale: -0.90, -1.49 to -0.31) but no change in dyspnea (-0.57, -1.32 to 0.17) and muscle strength (3.03, -1.89 to 7.96). There were no differences between telerehabilitation and face-to-face PR regarding effects on peripheral muscle strength (P=.42), dyspnea (P=.83), and fatigue (P=.34). There were no differences between programs 4-8 weeks and >8 weeks regarding exercise capacity (P=.83), peripheral muscle strength (P=.42), and dyspnea (P=.76). Conclusions: PR improves exercise capacity and reduces fatigue in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Duration of PR (4-8 weeks vs > 8 weeks) or PR modality (telerehabilitation vs face-to-face) did not affect outcomes but data were limited and based on subgroup analysis. Further evidence is required to determine the optimal delivery mode and duration of PR for post-COVID-19 syndrome.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Dyspnea
KW - Exercise capacity
KW - Fatigue
KW - Peripheral muscle strength
KW - Pulmonary rehabilitation
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Telerehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186948224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.007
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 38311096
AN - SCOPUS:85186948224
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 105
SP - 1559
EP - 1570
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -