TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Cytisine vs Varenicline on smoking cessation
T2 - a randomized clinical trial
AU - Courtney, Ryan J.
AU - McRobbie, Hayden
AU - Tutka, Piotr
AU - Weaver, Natasha A.
AU - Petrie, Dennis
AU - Mendelsohn, Colin P.
AU - Shakeshaft, Anthony
AU - Talukder, Saki
AU - Macdonald, Christel
AU - Thomas, Dennis
AU - Kwan, Benjamin C.H.
AU - Walker, Natalie
AU - Gartner, Coral
AU - Mattick, Richard P.
AU - Paul, Christine
AU - Ferguson, Stuart G.
AU - Zwar, Nicholas A.
AU - Richmond, Robyn L.
AU - Doran, Christopher M.
AU - Boland, Veronica C.
AU - Hall, Wayne
AU - West, Robert
AU - Farrell, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
a noninferiority trial of cytisine (Tabex) vs varenicline; receiving investigator-initiated grants and smoking cessation medication (varenicline) and matching placebo from Pfizer for the conduct of a relapse prevention trial in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who smoke; and serving as a consultant for and receiving honoraria and travel support for speaking at research meetings from Achieve Life Sciences and Pfizer (manufacturers of smoking cessation medications). Dr Gartner reported receiving grants from the Australian Research Council, Metro South Health Service, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Arthritis Australia, and the HIV Foundation Queensland. Dr Ferguson reported previously serving as a consultant to Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare on matters relating to smoking cessation and harm minimization; having been a member of a scientific advisory board for Johnson & Johnson; receiving researcher-initiated project grant funding from Pfizer (through the Grand initiative); and having provided consulting services to JUUL Labs Inc while working as a consultant for Pinney Associates. Dr Zwar reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline for advice on smoking cessation education programs and for conference expenses. Dr West reported serving as a consultant to Pfizer, which manufactures varenicline, and receiving grants from Pfizer. Dr Farrell reported receiving unrestricted research funding from Mundipharma, Seqirus, and Indivior. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding Information:
project grant 1108318 and career development fellowship grant 1148497 (awarded to Dr Courtney) from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. The University of New South Wales National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre is supported by grant funding from the Australian government under the Substance Misuse Prevention and Service Improvements Fund. All study medications were purchased by the research team.
Funding Information:
This study (APP1108318) is funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This research was funded by
Funding Information:
reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer for speaking at smoking cessation meetings and attending advisory board meetings. Drs McRobbie and Walker reported previously receiving cytisine from Sopharma for the conduct of a noninferiority trial of cytisine vs nicotine replacement therapy. Dr Tutka reported serving as consultant to Aflofarm, which is a manufacturer of cytisine. Dr Mendelsohn reported receiving funding from Pfizer Australia, GlaxoSmithKline, and Johnson & Johnson Pacific for teaching, consulting, serving on an advisory board, and conference expenses. Dr Kwan reported receiving speaking fees from Pfizer. Dr Walker reported receiving cytisine from Achieve Life Sciences for the conduct of
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/6
Y1 - 2021/7/6
N2 - Importance: Cytisine is more effective than placebo and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. However, cytisine has not been tested against the most effective smoking cessation medication, varenicline, which is associated with adverse events known to lead to discontinuation of therapy. Objective: To examine whether standard cytisine treatment (25 days) was at least as effective as standard varenicline treatment (84 days) for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment was undertaken in Australia from November 2017 through May 2019; follow-up was completed in January 2020. A total of 1452 Australian adult daily smokers willing to make a quit attempt were included. Data collection was conducted primarily by computer-assisted telephone interview, but there was an in-person visit to validate the primary outcome. Interventions: Treatments were provided in accordance with the manufacturers' recommended dosage: cytisine (n = 725), 1.5-mg capsules taken 6 times daily initially then gradually reduced over the 25-day course; varenicline (n = 727), 0.5-mg tablets titrated to 1 mg twice daily for 84 days (12 weeks). All participants were offered referral to standard telephone behavioral support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month continuous abstinence verified using a carbon monoxide breath test at 7-month follow-up. The noninferiority margin was set at 5% and the 1-sided significance threshold was set at.025. Results: Among 1452 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.7] years; 742 [51.1%] women), 1108 (76.3%) completed the trial. Verified 6-month continuous abstinence rates were 11.7% for the cytisine group and 13.3% for the varenicline group (risk difference, -1.62% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.02% to 8]; P =.03 for noninferiority). Self-reported adverse events occurred less frequently in the cytisine group (997 events among 482 participants) compared with the varenicline group (1206 events among 510 participants) and the incident rate ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95; P =.002). Conclusions and Relevance: Among daily smokers willing to quit, cytisine treatment for 25 days, compared with varenicline treatment for 84 days, failed to demonstrate noninferiority regarding smoking cessation. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001654448.
AB - Importance: Cytisine is more effective than placebo and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. However, cytisine has not been tested against the most effective smoking cessation medication, varenicline, which is associated with adverse events known to lead to discontinuation of therapy. Objective: To examine whether standard cytisine treatment (25 days) was at least as effective as standard varenicline treatment (84 days) for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment was undertaken in Australia from November 2017 through May 2019; follow-up was completed in January 2020. A total of 1452 Australian adult daily smokers willing to make a quit attempt were included. Data collection was conducted primarily by computer-assisted telephone interview, but there was an in-person visit to validate the primary outcome. Interventions: Treatments were provided in accordance with the manufacturers' recommended dosage: cytisine (n = 725), 1.5-mg capsules taken 6 times daily initially then gradually reduced over the 25-day course; varenicline (n = 727), 0.5-mg tablets titrated to 1 mg twice daily for 84 days (12 weeks). All participants were offered referral to standard telephone behavioral support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month continuous abstinence verified using a carbon monoxide breath test at 7-month follow-up. The noninferiority margin was set at 5% and the 1-sided significance threshold was set at.025. Results: Among 1452 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.7] years; 742 [51.1%] women), 1108 (76.3%) completed the trial. Verified 6-month continuous abstinence rates were 11.7% for the cytisine group and 13.3% for the varenicline group (risk difference, -1.62% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.02% to 8]; P =.03 for noninferiority). Self-reported adverse events occurred less frequently in the cytisine group (997 events among 482 participants) compared with the varenicline group (1206 events among 510 participants) and the incident rate ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95; P =.002). Conclusions and Relevance: Among daily smokers willing to quit, cytisine treatment for 25 days, compared with varenicline treatment for 84 days, failed to demonstrate noninferiority regarding smoking cessation. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001654448.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109283678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.2021.7621
DO - 10.1001/jama.2021.7621
M3 - Article
C2 - 34228066
AN - SCOPUS:85109283678
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 326
SP - 56
EP - 64
JO - JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 1
ER -