Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Emergency Medical Service Utilisation, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume—An Australian Perspective

Kawa Haji, Sara Vogrin, Nicholas D'Elia, Samer Noaman, Jason E. Bloom, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Chris Reid, Angela Brennan, Diem T. Dinh, Stephen Nicholls, Emily Nehme, Ziad Nehme, Karen Smith, Dion Stub, Jocasta Ball, Sarah Zaman, Ernesto Oqueli, David Kaye, Nicholas Cox, William Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume declined during periods of COVID-19 lockdown internationally in 2020. The effect of lockdown on emergency medical service (EMS) utilisation, and PCI volume during the initial phase of the pandemic in Australia has not been well described. Method: We analysed data from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), a state-wide PCI registry, linked with the Ambulance Victoria EMS registry. PCI volume, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularisation, and stroke), and EMS utilisation were compared over four time periods: lockdown (26 Mar 2020–12 May 2020); pre-lockdown (26 Feb 2020–25 Mar 2020); post-lockdown (13 May 2020–10 Jul 2020); and the year prior (26 Mar 2019–12 May 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess PCI trends within and between consecutive periods. Results: The EMS utilisation for ACS during lockdown was higher compared with other periods: lockdown 39.4% vs pre-lockdown 29.7%; vs post-lockdown 33.6%; vs year prior 27.1%; all p<0.01. Median daily PCI cases were similar: 31 (IQR 10, 38) during lockdown; 39 (15, 49) pre-lockdown; 39.5 (11, 44) post-lockdown; and, 42 (10, 49) the year prior; all p>0.05. Median door-to-procedure time for ACS indication during lockdown was shorter at 3 hours (1.2, 20.6) vs pre-lockdown 3.9 (1.7, 21); vs post-lockdown 3.5 (1.5, 21.26); and, the year prior 3.5 (1.5, 23.7); all p<0.05. Lockdown period was associated with lower odds for 30-day MACCE compared to pre-lockdown (odds ratio [OR] 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026); post-lockdown (OR 0.66; [0.40–1.06]; p=0.087); and the year prior (OR 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026). Conclusions: Contrary to international trends, EMS utilisation for ACS increased during lockdown but PCI volumes remained similar throughout the initial stages of the pandemic in Victoria, with no observed adverse effect on 30-day MACCE during lockdown. These data suggest that the public health response in Victoria was not associated with poorer quality cardiovascular care in patients receiving PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1151-1162
Number of pages12
JournalHeart Lung and Circulation
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Emergency medical services
  • Lockdown
  • PCI

Cite this