Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes

a review of existing indices

D. Tharanga Fernando, Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Stuart Newstead, Zahid Ansari

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Accounting for comorbidity in predicting outcomes for patients is vital in clinical care, epidemiological research, and health service planning. The aim of this study was to review published literature to compare the performance of existing comorbidity indices and their use in injury populations. Methods: A thematic literature search for comorbidity indices and/or injury outcomes was conducted. Methods, results, and recommendations from selected articles were abstracted, documented, and compared; comparisons of results were made in terms of the indices’ ability to predict outcomes, using the C-statistic, R2, and odds ratios. Results: Fifty-two articles relating to the derivation and/or validation of comorbidity measures were found. The most commonly used measures were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM). The ECM was found to outperform the CCI in terms of predictive ability, although the CCI was more widely used. Derivation of study-specific weights to the CCI added more predictive power to the index. Conclusions: Existing literature that compared the predictive abilities of the ECM and CCI favors the ECM. This literature review did not identify a measure specifically designed for general injury populations. Development of an injury-specific comorbidity measure will be timely and assist future research in injury epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Keywords

  • Charlson
  • Chronic disease
  • Comorbidity
  • Elixhauser
  • Index
  • Injury
  • Outcome
  • Trauma

Cite this

@article{fa72dbecaa4a49e8a4feea0b6296f2cf,
title = "Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes: a review of existing indices",
abstract = "Purpose: Accounting for comorbidity in predicting outcomes for patients is vital in clinical care, epidemiological research, and health service planning. The aim of this study was to review published literature to compare the performance of existing comorbidity indices and their use in injury populations. Methods: A thematic literature search for comorbidity indices and/or injury outcomes was conducted. Methods, results, and recommendations from selected articles were abstracted, documented, and compared; comparisons of results were made in terms of the indices’ ability to predict outcomes, using the C-statistic, R2, and odds ratios. Results: Fifty-two articles relating to the derivation and/or validation of comorbidity measures were found. The most commonly used measures were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM). The ECM was found to outperform the CCI in terms of predictive ability, although the CCI was more widely used. Derivation of study-specific weights to the CCI added more predictive power to the index. Conclusions: Existing literature that compared the predictive abilities of the ECM and CCI favors the ECM. This literature review did not identify a measure specifically designed for general injury populations. Development of an injury-specific comorbidity measure will be timely and assist future research in injury epidemiology.",
keywords = "Charlson, Chronic disease, Comorbidity, Elixhauser, Index, Injury, Outcome, Trauma",
author = "Fernando, {D. Tharanga} and Janneke Berecki-Gisolf and Stuart Newstead and Zahid Ansari",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004",
language = "English",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes : a review of existing indices. / Fernando, D. Tharanga; Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke; Newstead, Stuart; Ansari, Zahid.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes

T2 - a review of existing indices

AU - Fernando, D. Tharanga

AU - Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke

AU - Newstead, Stuart

AU - Ansari, Zahid

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: Accounting for comorbidity in predicting outcomes for patients is vital in clinical care, epidemiological research, and health service planning. The aim of this study was to review published literature to compare the performance of existing comorbidity indices and their use in injury populations. Methods: A thematic literature search for comorbidity indices and/or injury outcomes was conducted. Methods, results, and recommendations from selected articles were abstracted, documented, and compared; comparisons of results were made in terms of the indices’ ability to predict outcomes, using the C-statistic, R2, and odds ratios. Results: Fifty-two articles relating to the derivation and/or validation of comorbidity measures were found. The most commonly used measures were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM). The ECM was found to outperform the CCI in terms of predictive ability, although the CCI was more widely used. Derivation of study-specific weights to the CCI added more predictive power to the index. Conclusions: Existing literature that compared the predictive abilities of the ECM and CCI favors the ECM. This literature review did not identify a measure specifically designed for general injury populations. Development of an injury-specific comorbidity measure will be timely and assist future research in injury epidemiology.

AB - Purpose: Accounting for comorbidity in predicting outcomes for patients is vital in clinical care, epidemiological research, and health service planning. The aim of this study was to review published literature to compare the performance of existing comorbidity indices and their use in injury populations. Methods: A thematic literature search for comorbidity indices and/or injury outcomes was conducted. Methods, results, and recommendations from selected articles were abstracted, documented, and compared; comparisons of results were made in terms of the indices’ ability to predict outcomes, using the C-statistic, R2, and odds ratios. Results: Fifty-two articles relating to the derivation and/or validation of comorbidity measures were found. The most commonly used measures were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM). The ECM was found to outperform the CCI in terms of predictive ability, although the CCI was more widely used. Derivation of study-specific weights to the CCI added more predictive power to the index. Conclusions: Existing literature that compared the predictive abilities of the ECM and CCI favors the ECM. This literature review did not identify a measure specifically designed for general injury populations. Development of an injury-specific comorbidity measure will be timely and assist future research in injury epidemiology.

KW - Charlson

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Elixhauser

KW - Index

KW - Injury

KW - Outcome

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069443603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004

M3 - Review Article

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

ER -