Abstract
In this paper I aim to present an explanation of object permanence that is derived from an ecological account of perceptually based action. In understanding why children below a certain age do not search for occluded objects, one must first understand the process by which these children perform certain intentional actions on non-occluded items; and to do this one must understand the role affordances play in eliciting retrieval behaviour. My affordance-based explanation is contrasted with Shinskey and Munakata's graded representation account; and although I do not reject totally the role representations play in initiating intentional action I nevertheless maintain that only by incorporating direct perception into an account of object permanence can a fuller understanding of this phenomenon be achieved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 189-208 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Philosophical Explorations |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |