Echoes on the motor network:

How internal motor control structures afford sensory experience

Jed D. Burgess, Jarrad A G Lum, Jakob Hohwy, Peter G. Enticott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Often, during daily experiences, hearing peers’ actions can activate motor regions of the CNS. This activation is termed auditory–motor resonance (AMR) and is thought to represent an internal simulation of one’s motor memories. Currently, AMR is demonstrated at the neuronal level in the Macaque and songbird, in conjunction with evidence on a systems level in humans. Here, we review evidence of AMR development from a motor control perspective. In the context of internal modelling, we consider data that demonstrates sensory-guided motor learning and action maintenance, particularly the notion of sensory comparison seen during songbird vocalisation. We suggest that these comparisons generate accurate sensory-to-motor inverse mappings. Furthermore, given reports of mapping decay after songbird learning, we highlight the proposal that the maintenance of these sensorimotor maps potentially explains why frontoparietal regions are activated upon hearing known sounds (i.e., AMR). In addition, we also recommend that activation of these types of internal models outside of action execution may provide an ecological advantage when encountering known stimuli in ambiguous conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3865–3888
Number of pages24
JournalBrain Structure and Function
Volume222
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Auditory–motor resonance
  • Internal modelling
  • Mirror neurons
  • Sensory comparison
  • Sensory-guided motor learning

Cite this

@article{48568c50336848b9b2f3b3568dcadcb8,
title = "Echoes on the motor network:: How internal motor control structures afford sensory experience",
abstract = "Often, during daily experiences, hearing peers’ actions can activate motor regions of the CNS. This activation is termed auditory–motor resonance (AMR) and is thought to represent an internal simulation of one’s motor memories. Currently, AMR is demonstrated at the neuronal level in the Macaque and songbird, in conjunction with evidence on a systems level in humans. Here, we review evidence of AMR development from a motor control perspective. In the context of internal modelling, we consider data that demonstrates sensory-guided motor learning and action maintenance, particularly the notion of sensory comparison seen during songbird vocalisation. We suggest that these comparisons generate accurate sensory-to-motor inverse mappings. Furthermore, given reports of mapping decay after songbird learning, we highlight the proposal that the maintenance of these sensorimotor maps potentially explains why frontoparietal regions are activated upon hearing known sounds (i.e., AMR). In addition, we also recommend that activation of these types of internal models outside of action execution may provide an ecological advantage when encountering known stimuli in ambiguous conditions.",
keywords = "Auditory–motor resonance, Internal modelling, Mirror neurons, Sensory comparison, Sensory-guided motor learning",
author = "Burgess, {Jed D.} and Lum, {Jarrad A G} and Jakob Hohwy and Enticott, {Peter G.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s00429-017-1484-1",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
pages = "3865–3888",
journal = "Brain Structure and Function",
issn = "1863-2653",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "9",

}

Echoes on the motor network: How internal motor control structures afford sensory experience. / Burgess, Jed D.; Lum, Jarrad A G; Hohwy, Jakob; Enticott, Peter G.

In: Brain Structure and Function, Vol. 222, No. 9, 2017, p. 3865–3888.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echoes on the motor network:

T2 - How internal motor control structures afford sensory experience

AU - Burgess, Jed D.

AU - Lum, Jarrad A G

AU - Hohwy, Jakob

AU - Enticott, Peter G.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Often, during daily experiences, hearing peers’ actions can activate motor regions of the CNS. This activation is termed auditory–motor resonance (AMR) and is thought to represent an internal simulation of one’s motor memories. Currently, AMR is demonstrated at the neuronal level in the Macaque and songbird, in conjunction with evidence on a systems level in humans. Here, we review evidence of AMR development from a motor control perspective. In the context of internal modelling, we consider data that demonstrates sensory-guided motor learning and action maintenance, particularly the notion of sensory comparison seen during songbird vocalisation. We suggest that these comparisons generate accurate sensory-to-motor inverse mappings. Furthermore, given reports of mapping decay after songbird learning, we highlight the proposal that the maintenance of these sensorimotor maps potentially explains why frontoparietal regions are activated upon hearing known sounds (i.e., AMR). In addition, we also recommend that activation of these types of internal models outside of action execution may provide an ecological advantage when encountering known stimuli in ambiguous conditions.

AB - Often, during daily experiences, hearing peers’ actions can activate motor regions of the CNS. This activation is termed auditory–motor resonance (AMR) and is thought to represent an internal simulation of one’s motor memories. Currently, AMR is demonstrated at the neuronal level in the Macaque and songbird, in conjunction with evidence on a systems level in humans. Here, we review evidence of AMR development from a motor control perspective. In the context of internal modelling, we consider data that demonstrates sensory-guided motor learning and action maintenance, particularly the notion of sensory comparison seen during songbird vocalisation. We suggest that these comparisons generate accurate sensory-to-motor inverse mappings. Furthermore, given reports of mapping decay after songbird learning, we highlight the proposal that the maintenance of these sensorimotor maps potentially explains why frontoparietal regions are activated upon hearing known sounds (i.e., AMR). In addition, we also recommend that activation of these types of internal models outside of action execution may provide an ecological advantage when encountering known stimuli in ambiguous conditions.

KW - Auditory–motor resonance

KW - Internal modelling

KW - Mirror neurons

KW - Sensory comparison

KW - Sensory-guided motor learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026780783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00429-017-1484-1

DO - 10.1007/s00429-017-1484-1

M3 - Article

VL - 222

SP - 3865

EP - 3888

JO - Brain Structure and Function

JF - Brain Structure and Function

SN - 1863-2653

IS - 9

ER -