Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early favorable prostate-specific antigen response prediction in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer

  • Soumyajit Roy
  • , Yilun Sun
  • , Maha Hussain
  • , Kim N. Chi
  • , Karim Fizazi
  • , Ian D. Davis (Leading Author)
  • , Susan Halabi
  • , Neeraj Agarwal
  • , Simon Chowdhury
  • , Bertrand Tombal
  • , Scott C. Morgan
  • , Shawn Malone
  • , Pedro C. Barata
  • , Michael Ong
  • , Christopher J.D. Wallis
  • , Alejandro Berlin
  • , Umang Swami
  • , Amar U. Kishan
  • , Angela Y. Jia
  • , Nicholas G. Zaorsky
  • Jorge A. Garcia, Prateek Mendiratta, Jason R. Brown, Vinod V. Subhash, Martin R. Stockler, Hayley Thomas, Rana R. McKay, Eric J. Small, Neal D. Shore, Fred Saad, Christopher J. Sweeney, Daniel E. Spratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is an unmet need for a tool that could predict early favorable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients receiving androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). Here, we train and validate a multivariable logistic regression model to predict early favorable PSA response (≤0.2 ng/mL by 6 months) in these patients. Patients randomly allocated to the ARPI arms of the LATITUDE (abiraterone), TITAN (apalutamide), and ARASENS (darolutamide) trials, are split 60:40 into training (n = 1030) and internal validation (n = 688) cohorts. The locked model is validated in an independent external validation cohort - the enzalutamide arm of the ENZAMET trial (n = 540). The area under curve and Brier score for the locked model in the external validation cohort are 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.78–0.85) and 0.16, respectively. Stratification by predicted probability tertiles show PSA response rates of 92% (95% CI = 88–96), 74% (95% CI = 68–81), and 39% (95% CI = 32–47), respectively. Pending prospective validation, our model predicts early favorable PSA response supporting its potential role in guiding treatment decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number667
Number of pages10
JournalNature Communications
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this