TY - JOUR
T1 - Dust sprinkling as an effective method for infecting layer chickens with wild-type Salmonella Typhimurium and changes in host gut microbiota
AU - Khan, Samiullah
AU - McWhorter, Andrea R.
AU - Andrews, Daniel M.
AU - Underwood, Gregory J.
AU - Moore, Robert J.
AU - Van, Thi Thu Hao
AU - Gast, Richard K.
AU - Chousalkar, Kapil K.
N1 - Funding Information:
The help from Dr. Nicky-Lee Willson, Mr. Siyuan Jia and Dr. Nitish Joat in sample collection is greatly acknowledged. This study was financially supported through an Australian Research Council Linkage grant (LP190100864), a co-funded project by Australian Research Council and Bioproperties Pty Ltd, Australia.
Funding Information:
The help from Dr. Nicky\u2010Lee Willson, Mr. Siyuan Jia and Dr. Nitish Joat in sample collection is greatly acknowledged. This study was financially supported through an Australian Research Council Linkage grant (LP190100864), a co\u2010funded project by Australian Research Council and Bioproperties Pty Ltd, Australia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Role of dust in Salmonella transmission on chicken farms is not well characterised. Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) infection of commercial layer chickens was investigated using a novel sprinkling method of chicken dust spiked with ST and the uptake compared to a conventional oral infection. While both inoculation methods resulted in colonisation of the intestines, the Salmonella load in liver samples was significantly higher at 7 dpi after exposing chicks to sprinkled dust compared to the oral infection group. Infection of chickens using the sprinkling method at a range of doses showed a threshold for colonisation of the gut and organs as low as 1000 CFU/g of dust. Caecal content microbiota analysis post-challenge showed that the profiles of chickens infected by the sprinkling and oral routes were not significantly different; however, both challenges induced differences when compared to the uninfected negative controls. Overall, the study showed that dust sprinkling was an effective way to experimentally colonise chickens with Salmonella and alter the gut microbiota than oral gavage at levels as low as 1000 CFU/g dust. This infection model mimics the field scenario of Salmonella infection in poultry sheds. The model can be used for future challenge studies for effective Salmonella control.
AB - Role of dust in Salmonella transmission on chicken farms is not well characterised. Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) infection of commercial layer chickens was investigated using a novel sprinkling method of chicken dust spiked with ST and the uptake compared to a conventional oral infection. While both inoculation methods resulted in colonisation of the intestines, the Salmonella load in liver samples was significantly higher at 7 dpi after exposing chicks to sprinkled dust compared to the oral infection group. Infection of chickens using the sprinkling method at a range of doses showed a threshold for colonisation of the gut and organs as low as 1000 CFU/g of dust. Caecal content microbiota analysis post-challenge showed that the profiles of chickens infected by the sprinkling and oral routes were not significantly different; however, both challenges induced differences when compared to the uninfected negative controls. Overall, the study showed that dust sprinkling was an effective way to experimentally colonise chickens with Salmonella and alter the gut microbiota than oral gavage at levels as low as 1000 CFU/g dust. This infection model mimics the field scenario of Salmonella infection in poultry sheds. The model can be used for future challenge studies for effective Salmonella control.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85193206259
U2 - 10.1111/1758-2229.13265
DO - 10.1111/1758-2229.13265
M3 - Article
C2 - 38747207
AN - SCOPUS:85193206259
SN - 1758-2229
VL - 16
JO - Environmental Microbiology Reports
JF - Environmental Microbiology Reports
IS - 3
M1 - e13265
ER -