TY - JOUR
T1 - Drivers of carbon dioxide emissions
T2 - an empirical investigation using hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering methods
AU - Inekwe, John
AU - Maharaj, Elizabeth Ann
AU - Bhattacharya, Mita
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The mitigation of CO2 emissions requires a global effort with common but differentiated responsibilities. In this paper, we identify clusters of CO2 emissions across 72 countries. First, using the stochastic version of the IPAT and employing the dynamic common correlated effects technique, we identify three key determinants affecting CO2 emissions (non-renewables, population, and real GDP). In the second step, both hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering methods are considered to identify the optimal number of clusters. We identify two to four clusters with different member countries, and in particular establish that in most cases, a 2-cluster solution appears to be optimal. The contents of clusters vary slightly according to the clustering methods for each period. The clustering results from using only the overall CO2 emissions indicate that the countries we consider form three clusters, with China and the USA each within a single member cluster. The remaining 70 countries form the third cluster. Our findings reflect the prominent roles of China and the USA in overall CO2 emissions. Analyses with sub-period and largest emitters reflect a different clustering structure. Some policy recommendations in setting emission reductions are made, considering different clusters across countries.
AB - The mitigation of CO2 emissions requires a global effort with common but differentiated responsibilities. In this paper, we identify clusters of CO2 emissions across 72 countries. First, using the stochastic version of the IPAT and employing the dynamic common correlated effects technique, we identify three key determinants affecting CO2 emissions (non-renewables, population, and real GDP). In the second step, both hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering methods are considered to identify the optimal number of clusters. We identify two to four clusters with different member countries, and in particular establish that in most cases, a 2-cluster solution appears to be optimal. The contents of clusters vary slightly according to the clustering methods for each period. The clustering results from using only the overall CO2 emissions indicate that the countries we consider form three clusters, with China and the USA each within a single member cluster. The remaining 70 countries form the third cluster. Our findings reflect the prominent roles of China and the USA in overall CO2 emissions. Analyses with sub-period and largest emitters reflect a different clustering structure. Some policy recommendations in setting emission reductions are made, considering different clusters across countries.
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - CO emissions
KW - Key determinants
KW - Stochastic version of IPAT
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85077083177
U2 - 10.1007/s10651-019-00433-4
DO - 10.1007/s10651-019-00433-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077083177
SN - 1352-8505
VL - 27
SP - 1
EP - 40
JO - Environmental and Ecological Statistics
JF - Environmental and Ecological Statistics
IS - 1
ER -