TY - JOUR
T1 - Dose-dependent modulation of the visually evoked N1/N170 by perceptual surprise
T2 - a clear demonstration of prediction-error signalling
AU - Robinson, Jonathan E.
AU - Breakspear, Michael
AU - Young, Andrew W.
AU - Johnston, Patrick J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the gentle encouragement of The Oily Rag Foundation (EN10004). We also thank Anne Overell for work proofreading this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Prediction-error checking processes play a key role in predictive coding models of perception. However, neural indices of such processes have yet to be unambiguously demonstrated. To date, experimental paradigms aiming to study such phenomena have relied upon the relative frequency of stimulus repeats and/or ‘unexpected’ events that are physically different from ‘expected’ events. These features of experimental design leave open alternative explanations for the observed effects. A definitive demonstration requires that presumed prediction error-related responses should show contextual dependency (rather than simply effects of frequency or repetition) and should not be attributable to low-level stimulus differences. Most importantly, prediction-error signals should show dose dependency with respect to the degree to which expectations are violated. Here, we exploit a novel experimental paradigm specifically designed to address these issues, using it to interrogate early latency event-related potentials (ERPs) to contextually expected and unexpected visual stimuli. In two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments, we demonstrate that an N1/N170 evoked potential is robustly modulated by unexpected perceptual events (‘perceptual surprise’) and shows dose-dependent sensitivity with respect to both the influence of prior information and the extent to which expectations are violated. This advances our understanding of perceptual predictions in the visual domain by clearly identifying these evoked potentials as an index of visual surprise.
AB - Prediction-error checking processes play a key role in predictive coding models of perception. However, neural indices of such processes have yet to be unambiguously demonstrated. To date, experimental paradigms aiming to study such phenomena have relied upon the relative frequency of stimulus repeats and/or ‘unexpected’ events that are physically different from ‘expected’ events. These features of experimental design leave open alternative explanations for the observed effects. A definitive demonstration requires that presumed prediction error-related responses should show contextual dependency (rather than simply effects of frequency or repetition) and should not be attributable to low-level stimulus differences. Most importantly, prediction-error signals should show dose dependency with respect to the degree to which expectations are violated. Here, we exploit a novel experimental paradigm specifically designed to address these issues, using it to interrogate early latency event-related potentials (ERPs) to contextually expected and unexpected visual stimuli. In two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments, we demonstrate that an N1/N170 evoked potential is robustly modulated by unexpected perceptual events (‘perceptual surprise’) and shows dose-dependent sensitivity with respect to both the influence of prior information and the extent to which expectations are violated. This advances our understanding of perceptual predictions in the visual domain by clearly identifying these evoked potentials as an index of visual surprise.
KW - context trajectory
KW - event-related potentials
KW - expectancy violation
KW - prediction error
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045261419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ejn.13920
DO - 10.1111/ejn.13920
M3 - Article
C2 - 29602233
AN - SCOPUS:85045261419
SN - 0953-816X
VL - 52
SP - 4442
EP - 4452
JO - European Journal of Neuroscience
JF - European Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 11
ER -