Doing research in immigration removal centres: Ethics, emotions and impact

Mary Bosworth, Blerina Kellezi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) are deeply contested institutions that rarely open their doors to independent research. In this article we discuss some of the complications we faced in conducting the first national British study of everyday life in them. As we will set out, research relationships were difficult to forge due to low levels of trust and unfamiliarity with academic research. At the same time, many participants had unrealistic expectations about our capacity to assist while most exhibited high levels of distress. We were not immune from the emotional burden of the field sites. Such matters were compounded by the limited amount of published information about life in IRCs and a lack of ethical guidelines addressing such places. Drawing on related literature from prison sociology, we use our experiences in IRCs to set out a methodological account of understanding, ethics, and impact within these complex sites.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-137
Number of pages17
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Emotions
  • ethics
  • immigration removal centres
  • impact
  • research methods
  • trust

Cite this

@article{dd2c67eddfa64b72a8d1323b7149cc62,
title = "Doing research in immigration removal centres:: Ethics, emotions and impact",
abstract = "Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) are deeply contested institutions that rarely open their doors to independent research. In this article we discuss some of the complications we faced in conducting the first national British study of everyday life in them. As we will set out, research relationships were difficult to forge due to low levels of trust and unfamiliarity with academic research. At the same time, many participants had unrealistic expectations about our capacity to assist while most exhibited high levels of distress. We were not immune from the emotional burden of the field sites. Such matters were compounded by the limited amount of published information about life in IRCs and a lack of ethical guidelines addressing such places. Drawing on related literature from prison sociology, we use our experiences in IRCs to set out a methodological account of understanding, ethics, and impact within these complex sites.",
keywords = "Emotions, ethics, immigration removal centres, impact, research methods, trust",
author = "Mary Bosworth and Blerina Kellezi",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/1748895816646151",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "121--137",
journal = "Criminology and Criminal Justice",
issn = "1748-8958",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Doing research in immigration removal centres: Ethics, emotions and impact. / Bosworth, Mary; Kellezi, Blerina.

In: Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2017, p. 121-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing research in immigration removal centres:

T2 - Ethics, emotions and impact

AU - Bosworth, Mary

AU - Kellezi, Blerina

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) are deeply contested institutions that rarely open their doors to independent research. In this article we discuss some of the complications we faced in conducting the first national British study of everyday life in them. As we will set out, research relationships were difficult to forge due to low levels of trust and unfamiliarity with academic research. At the same time, many participants had unrealistic expectations about our capacity to assist while most exhibited high levels of distress. We were not immune from the emotional burden of the field sites. Such matters were compounded by the limited amount of published information about life in IRCs and a lack of ethical guidelines addressing such places. Drawing on related literature from prison sociology, we use our experiences in IRCs to set out a methodological account of understanding, ethics, and impact within these complex sites.

AB - Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) are deeply contested institutions that rarely open their doors to independent research. In this article we discuss some of the complications we faced in conducting the first national British study of everyday life in them. As we will set out, research relationships were difficult to forge due to low levels of trust and unfamiliarity with academic research. At the same time, many participants had unrealistic expectations about our capacity to assist while most exhibited high levels of distress. We were not immune from the emotional burden of the field sites. Such matters were compounded by the limited amount of published information about life in IRCs and a lack of ethical guidelines addressing such places. Drawing on related literature from prison sociology, we use our experiences in IRCs to set out a methodological account of understanding, ethics, and impact within these complex sites.

KW - Emotions

KW - ethics

KW - immigration removal centres

KW - impact

KW - research methods

KW - trust

U2 - 10.1177/1748895816646151

DO - 10.1177/1748895816646151

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 121

EP - 137

JO - Criminology and Criminal Justice

JF - Criminology and Criminal Justice

SN - 1748-8958

IS - 2

ER -