Does the Internet assist clients to carry out contact tracing? A randomized controlled trial using web-based information

J. E. Tomnay, M. K. Pitts, T. C. Kuo, C. K. Fairley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary outcome was to determine the acceptability of the Internet, specifically a website for use in standard partner notification. A secondary objective was to determine if a website would enhance the outcomes of currently used partner notification methods. In a randomized control trial, 105 participants diagnosed with chlamydia and non-gonoccocal urethritis (NGU) were randomized and 97 completed the study. About 30% of participants were provided a standard partner letter and 70% were provided the standard partner letter and website. All participants reported that their partners had no objections to the website (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-5%). There were no complaints received from any partner. The odds ratio for contacting partners was not significantly different between the two groups of participants. The results of this study indicate that providing a website with specific information about the infection to which a partner has been exposed is not harmful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-394
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of STD and AIDS
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006

Keywords

  • Contact
  • Notification
  • Partner
  • Tracing

Cite this

@article{f316474192d14d5b968aa3d54287c132,
title = "Does the Internet assist clients to carry out contact tracing? A randomized controlled trial using web-based information",
abstract = "The primary outcome was to determine the acceptability of the Internet, specifically a website for use in standard partner notification. A secondary objective was to determine if a website would enhance the outcomes of currently used partner notification methods. In a randomized control trial, 105 participants diagnosed with chlamydia and non-gonoccocal urethritis (NGU) were randomized and 97 completed the study. About 30{\%} of participants were provided a standard partner letter and 70{\%} were provided the standard partner letter and website. All participants reported that their partners had no objections to the website (0{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0-5{\%}). There were no complaints received from any partner. The odds ratio for contacting partners was not significantly different between the two groups of participants. The results of this study indicate that providing a website with specific information about the infection to which a partner has been exposed is not harmful.",
keywords = "Contact, Notification, Partner, Tracing",
author = "Tomnay, {J. E.} and Pitts, {M. K.} and Kuo, {T. C.} and Fairley, {C. K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1258/095646206777323391",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "391--394",
journal = "International Journal of STD and AIDS",
issn = "0956-4624",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Does the Internet assist clients to carry out contact tracing? A randomized controlled trial using web-based information. / Tomnay, J. E.; Pitts, M. K.; Kuo, T. C.; Fairley, C. K.

In: International Journal of STD and AIDS, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 391-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the Internet assist clients to carry out contact tracing? A randomized controlled trial using web-based information

AU - Tomnay, J. E.

AU - Pitts, M. K.

AU - Kuo, T. C.

AU - Fairley, C. K.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - The primary outcome was to determine the acceptability of the Internet, specifically a website for use in standard partner notification. A secondary objective was to determine if a website would enhance the outcomes of currently used partner notification methods. In a randomized control trial, 105 participants diagnosed with chlamydia and non-gonoccocal urethritis (NGU) were randomized and 97 completed the study. About 30% of participants were provided a standard partner letter and 70% were provided the standard partner letter and website. All participants reported that their partners had no objections to the website (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-5%). There were no complaints received from any partner. The odds ratio for contacting partners was not significantly different between the two groups of participants. The results of this study indicate that providing a website with specific information about the infection to which a partner has been exposed is not harmful.

AB - The primary outcome was to determine the acceptability of the Internet, specifically a website for use in standard partner notification. A secondary objective was to determine if a website would enhance the outcomes of currently used partner notification methods. In a randomized control trial, 105 participants diagnosed with chlamydia and non-gonoccocal urethritis (NGU) were randomized and 97 completed the study. About 30% of participants were provided a standard partner letter and 70% were provided the standard partner letter and website. All participants reported that their partners had no objections to the website (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-5%). There were no complaints received from any partner. The odds ratio for contacting partners was not significantly different between the two groups of participants. The results of this study indicate that providing a website with specific information about the infection to which a partner has been exposed is not harmful.

KW - Contact

KW - Notification

KW - Partner

KW - Tracing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646784748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1258/095646206777323391

DO - 10.1258/095646206777323391

M3 - Article

C2 - 16734961

AN - SCOPUS:33646784748

VL - 17

SP - 391

EP - 394

JO - International Journal of STD and AIDS

JF - International Journal of STD and AIDS

SN - 0956-4624

IS - 6

ER -