TY - JOUR
T1 - Does sustainability matter for Fintech firms? Evidence from United States firms
AU - Najaf, Khakan
AU - Haj Khalifa, Ali
AU - Obaid, Shaher Mohammad
AU - Rashidi, Abdulla Al
AU - Ataya, Ahmed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2023/1/9
Y1 - 2023/1/9
N2 - Purpose: This study aims to look at how financial technology (FinTech) companies adhere to sustainable standards in contrast to their counterparts. Following the validation of its new sustainability index, this study looks into the impact of sustainability on the stock performance of FinTech companies. Design/methodology/approach: To efficiently test the hypotheses, sample has been collected from the Bloomberg of all FinTech and non-FinTech companies from the USA. The final sample comprises 1,712 company-year observations over the investigation period 2010–2019. The methodology entails ordinary least squares regressions and generalized panel methods of moments (GMM). Findings: The results suggest that the developed sustainability index is a valid proxy for sustainability measures and directly relates to stock performance. Besides, the evidence indicates that non-FinTech companies display superior sustainability and stock performance compared to FinTech companies. The present results corroborate with stakeholder theory, which implies that quality sustainability performance will alleviate the agency issue and safeguard the shareholders’ interest. Research limitations/implications: Despite the fact that it presents the limitation of not considering other dimensions of financial performance, this research is important as it highlights the sustainability practices by the FinTech and non-FinTech companies, offering insights to researchers, policymakers, regulators, financial reports users, investors, environmental union, employees, clients and society. Originality/value: This paper is novel because it is unique in evaluating the sustainability practices in FinTech and non-FinTech firms.
AB - Purpose: This study aims to look at how financial technology (FinTech) companies adhere to sustainable standards in contrast to their counterparts. Following the validation of its new sustainability index, this study looks into the impact of sustainability on the stock performance of FinTech companies. Design/methodology/approach: To efficiently test the hypotheses, sample has been collected from the Bloomberg of all FinTech and non-FinTech companies from the USA. The final sample comprises 1,712 company-year observations over the investigation period 2010–2019. The methodology entails ordinary least squares regressions and generalized panel methods of moments (GMM). Findings: The results suggest that the developed sustainability index is a valid proxy for sustainability measures and directly relates to stock performance. Besides, the evidence indicates that non-FinTech companies display superior sustainability and stock performance compared to FinTech companies. The present results corroborate with stakeholder theory, which implies that quality sustainability performance will alleviate the agency issue and safeguard the shareholders’ interest. Research limitations/implications: Despite the fact that it presents the limitation of not considering other dimensions of financial performance, this research is important as it highlights the sustainability practices by the FinTech and non-FinTech companies, offering insights to researchers, policymakers, regulators, financial reports users, investors, environmental union, employees, clients and society. Originality/value: This paper is novel because it is unique in evaluating the sustainability practices in FinTech and non-FinTech firms.
KW - Climate change
KW - Environmental
KW - Fintech
KW - GMM
KW - Governance
KW - Social
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122821426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/CR-10-2021-0132
DO - 10.1108/CR-10-2021-0132
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122821426
SN - 1059-5422
VL - 33
SP - 161
EP - 180
JO - Competitiveness Review
JF - Competitiveness Review
IS - 1
ER -