TY - JOUR
T1 - Does pre-operative traction on the cervix approximate intra-operative uterine prolapse? A randomised controlled trial
AU - Chao, Fay
AU - Rosamilia, Anna
AU - Dwyer, Peter
AU - Polyakov, Alex
AU - Schierlitz, Lore
AU - Agnew, Gerard
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: This study aims to compare pre-operative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C with and without cervical traction to that obtained intra-operatively in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery and to assess acceptability of examination with cervical traction without anaesthesia. Methods: Eighty-one women were randomised to having pre-operative examination with or without cervical traction to measure point C. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded for each pre-operative examination. Comparisons were made between pre-operative and intra-operative findings. Results: The mean difference between pre-operative and intra-operative point C in the non-traction group was statistically higher than in the traction group (3.2 vs 1.6 cm, p0 0.0001). The level of agreement between pre-operative point C measurement with traction and intra-operative point C measurement was better than pre-operative point C measurement without traction and intra-operative point C measurement on Bland and Altman plots. Women having cervical traction reported significantly greater pain score on the VAS (3.4 vs. 1.2, p
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: This study aims to compare pre-operative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C with and without cervical traction to that obtained intra-operatively in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery and to assess acceptability of examination with cervical traction without anaesthesia. Methods: Eighty-one women were randomised to having pre-operative examination with or without cervical traction to measure point C. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded for each pre-operative examination. Comparisons were made between pre-operative and intra-operative findings. Results: The mean difference between pre-operative and intra-operative point C in the non-traction group was statistically higher than in the traction group (3.2 vs 1.6 cm, p0 0.0001). The level of agreement between pre-operative point C measurement with traction and intra-operative point C measurement was better than pre-operative point C measurement without traction and intra-operative point C measurement on Bland and Altman plots. Women having cervical traction reported significantly greater pain score on the VAS (3.4 vs. 1.2, p
UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-011-1656-0
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-011-1656-0
DO - 10.1007/s00192-011-1656-0
M3 - Article
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 23
SP - 417
EP - 422
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
IS - 4
ER -