Does personality influence learning? A case study in an invasive lizard

Melinda Chung, Celine Goulet, Marcus Michelangeli, Brooke Melki-Wegner, Bob B M Wong, David Gregory Chapple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning is a change in state resulting from new experiences enabling behavioural responses to be adjusted in alignment with external cues. Individuals differ in the speed and accuracy at which they learn. Personality has been postulated as being a major influence on learning ability in terms of attention and encounter rates of environmental cues. This link forms the basis of the cognitive style hypothesis (CSH), predicting that an individual’s cognitive style will occur along a fast–slow behavioural gradient. Fast types are characterised as being active, neophilic, and bold individuals who sample their environment rapidly, yet superficially, enabling learning to occur at a higher speed, but at the cost of accuracy. Slow types have the opposite suite of personality traits resulting in them being more accurate flexible learners. Greater level of learning flexibility is thought to help promote invasions success. Here, we test the predictions of the CSH in an invasive lizard (Lampropholis delicata) to determine if personality dictates learning performance in a two-phase associative task. Results indicated that the delicate skink was capable of learning an associative task but only provided partial support for the CSH. Personality was found to influence learning accuracy, however, the direction of that relationship was opposite to that predicted. Instead, fast lizards made fewer mistakes when learning to associate a colour to a goal. These findings highlight the need to further investigate the CSH across taxa and consider its potential as an underlying mechanism of the invasion process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)641-651
Number of pages11
JournalOecologia
Volume185
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Associative learning
  • Behaviour
  • Cognitive style hypothesis
  • Lizard
  • Personality type

Cite this

Chung, Melinda ; Goulet, Celine ; Michelangeli, Marcus ; Melki-Wegner, Brooke ; Wong, Bob B M ; Chapple, David Gregory. / Does personality influence learning? A case study in an invasive lizard. In: Oecologia. 2017 ; Vol. 185, No. 4. pp. 641-651.
@article{826ca3c6c0514d0fa2812103b55b2f4f,
title = "Does personality influence learning? A case study in an invasive lizard",
abstract = "Learning is a change in state resulting from new experiences enabling behavioural responses to be adjusted in alignment with external cues. Individuals differ in the speed and accuracy at which they learn. Personality has been postulated as being a major influence on learning ability in terms of attention and encounter rates of environmental cues. This link forms the basis of the cognitive style hypothesis (CSH), predicting that an individual’s cognitive style will occur along a fast–slow behavioural gradient. Fast types are characterised as being active, neophilic, and bold individuals who sample their environment rapidly, yet superficially, enabling learning to occur at a higher speed, but at the cost of accuracy. Slow types have the opposite suite of personality traits resulting in them being more accurate flexible learners. Greater level of learning flexibility is thought to help promote invasions success. Here, we test the predictions of the CSH in an invasive lizard (Lampropholis delicata) to determine if personality dictates learning performance in a two-phase associative task. Results indicated that the delicate skink was capable of learning an associative task but only provided partial support for the CSH. Personality was found to influence learning accuracy, however, the direction of that relationship was opposite to that predicted. Instead, fast lizards made fewer mistakes when learning to associate a colour to a goal. These findings highlight the need to further investigate the CSH across taxa and consider its potential as an underlying mechanism of the invasion process.",
keywords = "Associative learning, Behaviour, Cognitive style hypothesis, Lizard, Personality type",
author = "Melinda Chung and Celine Goulet and Marcus Michelangeli and Brooke Melki-Wegner and Wong, {Bob B M} and Chapple, {David Gregory}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-017-3975-4",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "641--651",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Does personality influence learning? A case study in an invasive lizard. / Chung, Melinda; Goulet, Celine; Michelangeli, Marcus; Melki-Wegner, Brooke; Wong, Bob B M; Chapple, David Gregory.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 185, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 641-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does personality influence learning? A case study in an invasive lizard

AU - Chung, Melinda

AU - Goulet, Celine

AU - Michelangeli, Marcus

AU - Melki-Wegner, Brooke

AU - Wong, Bob B M

AU - Chapple, David Gregory

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Learning is a change in state resulting from new experiences enabling behavioural responses to be adjusted in alignment with external cues. Individuals differ in the speed and accuracy at which they learn. Personality has been postulated as being a major influence on learning ability in terms of attention and encounter rates of environmental cues. This link forms the basis of the cognitive style hypothesis (CSH), predicting that an individual’s cognitive style will occur along a fast–slow behavioural gradient. Fast types are characterised as being active, neophilic, and bold individuals who sample their environment rapidly, yet superficially, enabling learning to occur at a higher speed, but at the cost of accuracy. Slow types have the opposite suite of personality traits resulting in them being more accurate flexible learners. Greater level of learning flexibility is thought to help promote invasions success. Here, we test the predictions of the CSH in an invasive lizard (Lampropholis delicata) to determine if personality dictates learning performance in a two-phase associative task. Results indicated that the delicate skink was capable of learning an associative task but only provided partial support for the CSH. Personality was found to influence learning accuracy, however, the direction of that relationship was opposite to that predicted. Instead, fast lizards made fewer mistakes when learning to associate a colour to a goal. These findings highlight the need to further investigate the CSH across taxa and consider its potential as an underlying mechanism of the invasion process.

AB - Learning is a change in state resulting from new experiences enabling behavioural responses to be adjusted in alignment with external cues. Individuals differ in the speed and accuracy at which they learn. Personality has been postulated as being a major influence on learning ability in terms of attention and encounter rates of environmental cues. This link forms the basis of the cognitive style hypothesis (CSH), predicting that an individual’s cognitive style will occur along a fast–slow behavioural gradient. Fast types are characterised as being active, neophilic, and bold individuals who sample their environment rapidly, yet superficially, enabling learning to occur at a higher speed, but at the cost of accuracy. Slow types have the opposite suite of personality traits resulting in them being more accurate flexible learners. Greater level of learning flexibility is thought to help promote invasions success. Here, we test the predictions of the CSH in an invasive lizard (Lampropholis delicata) to determine if personality dictates learning performance in a two-phase associative task. Results indicated that the delicate skink was capable of learning an associative task but only provided partial support for the CSH. Personality was found to influence learning accuracy, however, the direction of that relationship was opposite to that predicted. Instead, fast lizards made fewer mistakes when learning to associate a colour to a goal. These findings highlight the need to further investigate the CSH across taxa and consider its potential as an underlying mechanism of the invasion process.

KW - Associative learning

KW - Behaviour

KW - Cognitive style hypothesis

KW - Lizard

KW - Personality type

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031404479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-017-3975-4

DO - 10.1007/s00442-017-3975-4

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 641

EP - 651

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 4

ER -