Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China

Longyao Zhang, Wenli Cheng, Enjiang Cheng, Bi Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Based on official surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, we study how the Chinese land titling reform beginning in 2009 affected rural households’ access to credit. We find that the reform had differential credit effects across households. For households with above-average economic status (measured by the area of cultivated land, level of income, and convenience of bank visits), access to formal credit improved as a result of the reform. For households with below-average economics status, reliance on informal credit lessened. We show that the availability of land as collateral might have enhanced access to formal credit. Another channel of the credit effects was income and wealth. We find that land titling had a positive impact on average household income, which would reduce their need for informal credit. For those households with above-average area of cultivated land, land titling increased their wealth and might have expanded their operations, which would increase both their credit demand and their ability to access formal credit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-241
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Economics
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • access to credit
  • channels of the credit effects
  • quasi-experiment
  • Rural land titling

Cite this

Zhang, Longyao ; Cheng, Wenli ; Cheng, Enjiang ; Wu, Bi. / Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China. In: Applied Economics. 2020 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 227-241.
@article{99f44e3aed844a76930bfc9a0475887b,
title = "Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China",
abstract = "Based on official surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, we study how the Chinese land titling reform beginning in 2009 affected rural households’ access to credit. We find that the reform had differential credit effects across households. For households with above-average economic status (measured by the area of cultivated land, level of income, and convenience of bank visits), access to formal credit improved as a result of the reform. For households with below-average economics status, reliance on informal credit lessened. We show that the availability of land as collateral might have enhanced access to formal credit. Another channel of the credit effects was income and wealth. We find that land titling had a positive impact on average household income, which would reduce their need for informal credit. For those households with above-average area of cultivated land, land titling increased their wealth and might have expanded their operations, which would increase both their credit demand and their ability to access formal credit.",
keywords = "access to credit, channels of the credit effects, quasi-experiment, Rural land titling",
author = "Longyao Zhang and Wenli Cheng and Enjiang Cheng and Bi Wu",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/00036846.2019.1644446",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "227--241",
journal = "Applied Economics",
issn = "0003-6846",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China. / Zhang, Longyao; Cheng, Wenli; Cheng, Enjiang; Wu, Bi.

In: Applied Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2020, p. 227-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China

AU - Zhang, Longyao

AU - Cheng, Wenli

AU - Cheng, Enjiang

AU - Wu, Bi

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Based on official surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, we study how the Chinese land titling reform beginning in 2009 affected rural households’ access to credit. We find that the reform had differential credit effects across households. For households with above-average economic status (measured by the area of cultivated land, level of income, and convenience of bank visits), access to formal credit improved as a result of the reform. For households with below-average economics status, reliance on informal credit lessened. We show that the availability of land as collateral might have enhanced access to formal credit. Another channel of the credit effects was income and wealth. We find that land titling had a positive impact on average household income, which would reduce their need for informal credit. For those households with above-average area of cultivated land, land titling increased their wealth and might have expanded their operations, which would increase both their credit demand and their ability to access formal credit.

AB - Based on official surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, we study how the Chinese land titling reform beginning in 2009 affected rural households’ access to credit. We find that the reform had differential credit effects across households. For households with above-average economic status (measured by the area of cultivated land, level of income, and convenience of bank visits), access to formal credit improved as a result of the reform. For households with below-average economics status, reliance on informal credit lessened. We show that the availability of land as collateral might have enhanced access to formal credit. Another channel of the credit effects was income and wealth. We find that land titling had a positive impact on average household income, which would reduce their need for informal credit. For those households with above-average area of cultivated land, land titling increased their wealth and might have expanded their operations, which would increase both their credit demand and their ability to access formal credit.

KW - access to credit

KW - channels of the credit effects

KW - quasi-experiment

KW - Rural land titling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075544204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00036846.2019.1644446

DO - 10.1080/00036846.2019.1644446

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075544204

VL - 52

SP - 227

EP - 241

JO - Applied Economics

JF - Applied Economics

SN - 0003-6846

IS - 2

ER -