TY - JOUR
T1 - Does in-hospital trauma mortality in urban Indian academic centres differ between “office-hours” and “after-hours”?
AU - Soni, Kapil Dev
AU - Khajanchi, Monty
AU - Raykar, Nakul
AU - Sarang, Bhakti
AU - O'Reilly, Gerard M.
AU - Dharap, Satish
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Sharma, Naveen
AU - Howard, Teresa
AU - Farrow, Nathan
AU - Roy, Nobhojit
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Introduction: Trauma services within hospitals may vary considerably at different times across a 24 h period. The variable services may negatively affect the outcome of trauma victims. The current investigation aims to study the effect of arrival time of major trauma patients on mortality and morbidity. Method: Retrospective analysis of the Australia-India Trauma Systems Collaboration (AITSC) registry established in four public university teaching centres in India Based on hospital arrival time, patients were grouped into “Office-hours” and “After-hours”. Outcome parameters were compared between the above groups. Results: 5536 (68.4%) patients presented “after-hours” (AO) and 2561 (31.6%) during “office-hours” (OH). The in-hospital mortality for “after-hours” and “office-hours” presentations were 12.1% and 11.6% respectively. On unadjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference in the odds of survival for OH versus AH presentations. (OR,1.05, 95% CI 0.9-1.2). Adjusting for potential prognostic factors (injury severity, presence of shock on arrival, referral status, sex, or extremes of age), there was no statistically significant odds of survival for OH versus AH presentations (OR,1.02, 95%CI 0.9–1.2).ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation was longer in the AH group. Conclusion: The in-hospital mortality did not differ between trauma patients who arrived during “after-hours” compared to ‘“office-hours”.
AB - Introduction: Trauma services within hospitals may vary considerably at different times across a 24 h period. The variable services may negatively affect the outcome of trauma victims. The current investigation aims to study the effect of arrival time of major trauma patients on mortality and morbidity. Method: Retrospective analysis of the Australia-India Trauma Systems Collaboration (AITSC) registry established in four public university teaching centres in India Based on hospital arrival time, patients were grouped into “Office-hours” and “After-hours”. Outcome parameters were compared between the above groups. Results: 5536 (68.4%) patients presented “after-hours” (AO) and 2561 (31.6%) during “office-hours” (OH). The in-hospital mortality for “after-hours” and “office-hours” presentations were 12.1% and 11.6% respectively. On unadjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference in the odds of survival for OH versus AH presentations. (OR,1.05, 95% CI 0.9-1.2). Adjusting for potential prognostic factors (injury severity, presence of shock on arrival, referral status, sex, or extremes of age), there was no statistically significant odds of survival for OH versus AH presentations (OR,1.02, 95%CI 0.9–1.2).ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation was longer in the AH group. Conclusion: The in-hospital mortality did not differ between trauma patients who arrived during “after-hours” compared to ‘“office-hours”.
KW - After hours
KW - Low middle income countries
KW - Mortality
KW - Office hours
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097049750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.11.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33242732
AN - SCOPUS:85097049750
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 62
SP - 31
EP - 37
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
ER -