Does consistency in management control systems design choices influence firm performance? An empirical analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the impact on firm performance of theoretically consistent relationships between three management control systems (MCS) design choices - delegation, performance measurement, and incentive compensation. Based upon the three-legged stool model and agency theory, the hypothesis is that theoretically consistent MCS design choices are associated with enhanced firm performance. Using survey data from large Australian firms, the findings support the hypothesis, suggesting that an appropriate MCS design is a determinant of firm performance. The study contributes to the literature by moving beyond a focus on the antecedents of the three key MCS design choices to the consequence of alignment of those choices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497 - 522
Number of pages26
JournalAccounting and Business Research
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{414c6361dc4a49a4a15124abef06cfc4,
title = "Does consistency in management control systems design choices influence firm performance? An empirical analysis",
abstract = "This study examines the impact on firm performance of theoretically consistent relationships between three management control systems (MCS) design choices - delegation, performance measurement, and incentive compensation. Based upon the three-legged stool model and agency theory, the hypothesis is that theoretically consistent MCS design choices are associated with enhanced firm performance. Using survey data from large Australian firms, the findings support the hypothesis, suggesting that an appropriate MCS design is a determinant of firm performance. The study contributes to the literature by moving beyond a focus on the antecedents of the three key MCS design choices to the consequence of alignment of those choices.",
author = "Zhiyun Gong and Aldonio Ferreira",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/00014788.2014.901164",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "497 -- 522",
journal = "Accounting and Business Research",
issn = "0001-4788",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Does consistency in management control systems design choices influence firm performance? An empirical analysis. / Gong, Zhiyun; Ferreira, Aldonio.

In: Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2014, p. 497 - 522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does consistency in management control systems design choices influence firm performance? An empirical analysis

AU - Gong, Zhiyun

AU - Ferreira, Aldonio

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This study examines the impact on firm performance of theoretically consistent relationships between three management control systems (MCS) design choices - delegation, performance measurement, and incentive compensation. Based upon the three-legged stool model and agency theory, the hypothesis is that theoretically consistent MCS design choices are associated with enhanced firm performance. Using survey data from large Australian firms, the findings support the hypothesis, suggesting that an appropriate MCS design is a determinant of firm performance. The study contributes to the literature by moving beyond a focus on the antecedents of the three key MCS design choices to the consequence of alignment of those choices.

AB - This study examines the impact on firm performance of theoretically consistent relationships between three management control systems (MCS) design choices - delegation, performance measurement, and incentive compensation. Based upon the three-legged stool model and agency theory, the hypothesis is that theoretically consistent MCS design choices are associated with enhanced firm performance. Using survey data from large Australian firms, the findings support the hypothesis, suggesting that an appropriate MCS design is a determinant of firm performance. The study contributes to the literature by moving beyond a focus on the antecedents of the three key MCS design choices to the consequence of alignment of those choices.

U2 - 10.1080/00014788.2014.901164

DO - 10.1080/00014788.2014.901164

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 497

EP - 522

JO - Accounting and Business Research

JF - Accounting and Business Research

SN - 0001-4788

IS - 5

ER -