Does anaesthetic technique affect the outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate?

M. D S Reeves, P. S. Myles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


Objective. To determine if the choice of anaesthetic (spinal or general) has any influence on outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and methods. The records of 261 patients undergoing TURP between October 1995 and July 1998 were selected for a matched-cohort study. There were 87 complete datasets for cases performed under general anaesthesia and each was matched to two patients (174) from those undergoing spinal anaesthesia. The cohorts were matched by age, physical status score and date of operation. The primary outcome measures were length of stay in the recovery room and satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. Results. There were no significant differences in major outcomes. There was a higher incidence of some minor adverse events in the group having general anaesthesia. Back pain was more common after spinal anaesthesia. Conclusion. Spinal anaesthesia was not associated with an improved outcome after TURP. The choice of anaesthesia should be made by the patient, surgeon and anaesthetist on the basis of the known risks of particular adverse events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)982-986
Number of pages5
JournalBJU International
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1999


  • Anaesthesia
  • Prostate
  • Spinal
  • Surgery
  • TURP

Cite this