Do Primary-Care Clinicians Think That Nonspecific Low Back Pain Is One Condition?

Peter Kent, Jenny Keating

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Postal survey. Objectives. To determine whether Australian primary-care clinicians think that nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is one condition or a number of conditions (subgroups), and whether this belief influences their management of NSLBP. Summary of Background Data. Most low back pain (LBP) remains a diagnostic enigma and results in approximately 80% of primary care LBP presentations being most accurately labeled as "nonspecific LBP." Manual therapy clinicians (chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists) are trained to think that subgroups exist within the NSLBP population. This research sought to identify the extent to which these beliefs are widely held in primary care. Methods. A survey was conducted of 1,093 primary-contact clinicians from six professional disciplines (physiotherapists, manipulative physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, general medical practitioners, and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners). Results. Completed questionnaires were returned by 651 (60%) clinicians. Of the primary-contact clinicians who responded, 93% do not think NSLBP is one condition. Seventy-four percent think that it is currently possible to recognize NSLBP subgroups. Ninety-three percent treat NSLBP differently based on patterns of signs and symptoms. The proportions of clinicians who hold these views were highest for physiotherapists and manipulative physiotherapists, and smallest for general medical practitioners and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners. Conclusions. Although assigning NSLBP patients to subgroups has not been validated, it is common in primary-care settings and influences case management. If subgroups exist within the NSLBP population, there are implications for research into the effects of treatment. Further research into the validity of subgroups is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1022-1031
Number of pages10
JournalSpine
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2004

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Diagnosis
  • Nonspecific low back pain
  • Primary-contact
  • Subgroups

Cite this

@article{7f77211721ab4eb3b6e97d00e89b8313,
title = "Do Primary-Care Clinicians Think That Nonspecific Low Back Pain Is One Condition?",
abstract = "Study Design. Postal survey. Objectives. To determine whether Australian primary-care clinicians think that nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is one condition or a number of conditions (subgroups), and whether this belief influences their management of NSLBP. Summary of Background Data. Most low back pain (LBP) remains a diagnostic enigma and results in approximately 80{\%} of primary care LBP presentations being most accurately labeled as {"}nonspecific LBP.{"} Manual therapy clinicians (chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists) are trained to think that subgroups exist within the NSLBP population. This research sought to identify the extent to which these beliefs are widely held in primary care. Methods. A survey was conducted of 1,093 primary-contact clinicians from six professional disciplines (physiotherapists, manipulative physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, general medical practitioners, and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners). Results. Completed questionnaires were returned by 651 (60{\%}) clinicians. Of the primary-contact clinicians who responded, 93{\%} do not think NSLBP is one condition. Seventy-four percent think that it is currently possible to recognize NSLBP subgroups. Ninety-three percent treat NSLBP differently based on patterns of signs and symptoms. The proportions of clinicians who hold these views were highest for physiotherapists and manipulative physiotherapists, and smallest for general medical practitioners and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners. Conclusions. Although assigning NSLBP patients to subgroups has not been validated, it is common in primary-care settings and influences case management. If subgroups exist within the NSLBP population, there are implications for research into the effects of treatment. Further research into the validity of subgroups is warranted.",
keywords = "Classification, Diagnosis, Nonspecific low back pain, Primary-contact, Subgroups",
author = "Peter Kent and Jenny Keating",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-200405010-00015",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1022--1031",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

Do Primary-Care Clinicians Think That Nonspecific Low Back Pain Is One Condition? / Kent, Peter; Keating, Jenny.

In: Spine, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.05.2004, p. 1022-1031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Primary-Care Clinicians Think That Nonspecific Low Back Pain Is One Condition?

AU - Kent, Peter

AU - Keating, Jenny

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Study Design. Postal survey. Objectives. To determine whether Australian primary-care clinicians think that nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is one condition or a number of conditions (subgroups), and whether this belief influences their management of NSLBP. Summary of Background Data. Most low back pain (LBP) remains a diagnostic enigma and results in approximately 80% of primary care LBP presentations being most accurately labeled as "nonspecific LBP." Manual therapy clinicians (chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists) are trained to think that subgroups exist within the NSLBP population. This research sought to identify the extent to which these beliefs are widely held in primary care. Methods. A survey was conducted of 1,093 primary-contact clinicians from six professional disciplines (physiotherapists, manipulative physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, general medical practitioners, and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners). Results. Completed questionnaires were returned by 651 (60%) clinicians. Of the primary-contact clinicians who responded, 93% do not think NSLBP is one condition. Seventy-four percent think that it is currently possible to recognize NSLBP subgroups. Ninety-three percent treat NSLBP differently based on patterns of signs and symptoms. The proportions of clinicians who hold these views were highest for physiotherapists and manipulative physiotherapists, and smallest for general medical practitioners and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners. Conclusions. Although assigning NSLBP patients to subgroups has not been validated, it is common in primary-care settings and influences case management. If subgroups exist within the NSLBP population, there are implications for research into the effects of treatment. Further research into the validity of subgroups is warranted.

AB - Study Design. Postal survey. Objectives. To determine whether Australian primary-care clinicians think that nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is one condition or a number of conditions (subgroups), and whether this belief influences their management of NSLBP. Summary of Background Data. Most low back pain (LBP) remains a diagnostic enigma and results in approximately 80% of primary care LBP presentations being most accurately labeled as "nonspecific LBP." Manual therapy clinicians (chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists) are trained to think that subgroups exist within the NSLBP population. This research sought to identify the extent to which these beliefs are widely held in primary care. Methods. A survey was conducted of 1,093 primary-contact clinicians from six professional disciplines (physiotherapists, manipulative physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, general medical practitioners, and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners). Results. Completed questionnaires were returned by 651 (60%) clinicians. Of the primary-contact clinicians who responded, 93% do not think NSLBP is one condition. Seventy-four percent think that it is currently possible to recognize NSLBP subgroups. Ninety-three percent treat NSLBP differently based on patterns of signs and symptoms. The proportions of clinicians who hold these views were highest for physiotherapists and manipulative physiotherapists, and smallest for general medical practitioners and musculoskeletal medicine practitioners. Conclusions. Although assigning NSLBP patients to subgroups has not been validated, it is common in primary-care settings and influences case management. If subgroups exist within the NSLBP population, there are implications for research into the effects of treatment. Further research into the validity of subgroups is warranted.

KW - Classification

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Nonspecific low back pain

KW - Primary-contact

KW - Subgroups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342539044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-200405010-00015

DO - 10.1097/00007632-200405010-00015

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1022

EP - 1031

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 9

ER -