Do financial analysts' long-term growth forecasts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations and career outcomes

Boochun Jung, Philip B. Shane, Yanhua Sunny Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


Prior literature portrays long-term growth (LTG) forecasts as nonsensical from a valuation perspective. Instead, we hypothesize that LTG forecasts signal high effort and ability to analyze firms' long-term prospects. We document stronger market response to stock recommendation revisions of analysts who publish accompanying LTG forecasts. We also hypothesize and find that these analysts are less likely to leave the profession or move to smaller brokerage houses. Consistent with Reg. FD's intention to promote fundamental analysis of long-term earnings prospects, post-Reg. FD observations drive our results. Overall, we identify previously undocumented benefits accruing to analysts who publish LTG forecasts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-76
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Accounting and Economics
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • Analysts' career outcomes
  • Analysts' forecasts
  • Financial analysts
  • Long-term growth
  • Stock recommendations
  • Value-relevance

Cite this