Distribution of bipolar input to midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset retina

Bahar Erikoz, Patricia Regina Jusuf, Kumiko Percival, Ulrike Grunert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Different types of retinal ganglion cell show differences in their response properties. Here we investigated the question of whether these differences are related to the distribution of the synaptic input to the dendritic tree. We measured the distribution and density of synaptic input to the dendrites of midget and parasol ganglion cells in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Ganglion cells were retrogradely labeled by dye injection into parvocellular or magnocellular regions of the lateral geniculate nucleus and subsequently photo-filled. Presumed bipolar cell synapses were identified immunocytochemically using antibodies against the ribbon protein CtBP2 or the GluR4 subunit of the AMPA receptor. For all cells, colocalized immunoreactive puncta were distributed across the entire dendritic tree. The density of the presumed bipolar input to midget ganglion cells was comparable for both synaptic markers, suggesting that the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit is expressed at all synapses between midget bipolar and midget ganglion cells. Midget ganglion cells had an average of nine colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface, and parasol cells had an average of seven colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface. The densities were comparable in different regions of the dendritic tree and were not influenced by the location of the cells with respect to the fovea. Our findings suggest that the differences in the response characteristics of midget and parasol cells are not due to differences in the density of synaptic input to their dendritic tree.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67 - 76
Number of pages10
JournalVisual Neuroscience
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Cite this

Erikoz, Bahar ; Jusuf, Patricia Regina ; Percival, Kumiko ; Grunert, Ulrike. / Distribution of bipolar input to midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset retina. In: Visual Neuroscience. 2008 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 67 - 76.
@article{d8790063cd5d4dd697e3f4d4878c4668,
title = "Distribution of bipolar input to midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset retina",
abstract = "Different types of retinal ganglion cell show differences in their response properties. Here we investigated the question of whether these differences are related to the distribution of the synaptic input to the dendritic tree. We measured the distribution and density of synaptic input to the dendrites of midget and parasol ganglion cells in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Ganglion cells were retrogradely labeled by dye injection into parvocellular or magnocellular regions of the lateral geniculate nucleus and subsequently photo-filled. Presumed bipolar cell synapses were identified immunocytochemically using antibodies against the ribbon protein CtBP2 or the GluR4 subunit of the AMPA receptor. For all cells, colocalized immunoreactive puncta were distributed across the entire dendritic tree. The density of the presumed bipolar input to midget ganglion cells was comparable for both synaptic markers, suggesting that the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit is expressed at all synapses between midget bipolar and midget ganglion cells. Midget ganglion cells had an average of nine colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface, and parasol cells had an average of seven colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface. The densities were comparable in different regions of the dendritic tree and were not influenced by the location of the cells with respect to the fovea. Our findings suggest that the differences in the response characteristics of midget and parasol cells are not due to differences in the density of synaptic input to their dendritic tree.",
author = "Bahar Erikoz and Jusuf, {Patricia Regina} and Kumiko Percival and Ulrike Grunert",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1017/S0952523808080073",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "67 -- 76",
journal = "Visual Neuroscience",
issn = "0952-5238",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Distribution of bipolar input to midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset retina. / Erikoz, Bahar; Jusuf, Patricia Regina; Percival, Kumiko; Grunert, Ulrike.

In: Visual Neuroscience, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2008, p. 67 - 76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distribution of bipolar input to midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset retina

AU - Erikoz, Bahar

AU - Jusuf, Patricia Regina

AU - Percival, Kumiko

AU - Grunert, Ulrike

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Different types of retinal ganglion cell show differences in their response properties. Here we investigated the question of whether these differences are related to the distribution of the synaptic input to the dendritic tree. We measured the distribution and density of synaptic input to the dendrites of midget and parasol ganglion cells in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Ganglion cells were retrogradely labeled by dye injection into parvocellular or magnocellular regions of the lateral geniculate nucleus and subsequently photo-filled. Presumed bipolar cell synapses were identified immunocytochemically using antibodies against the ribbon protein CtBP2 or the GluR4 subunit of the AMPA receptor. For all cells, colocalized immunoreactive puncta were distributed across the entire dendritic tree. The density of the presumed bipolar input to midget ganglion cells was comparable for both synaptic markers, suggesting that the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit is expressed at all synapses between midget bipolar and midget ganglion cells. Midget ganglion cells had an average of nine colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface, and parasol cells had an average of seven colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface. The densities were comparable in different regions of the dendritic tree and were not influenced by the location of the cells with respect to the fovea. Our findings suggest that the differences in the response characteristics of midget and parasol cells are not due to differences in the density of synaptic input to their dendritic tree.

AB - Different types of retinal ganglion cell show differences in their response properties. Here we investigated the question of whether these differences are related to the distribution of the synaptic input to the dendritic tree. We measured the distribution and density of synaptic input to the dendrites of midget and parasol ganglion cells in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Ganglion cells were retrogradely labeled by dye injection into parvocellular or magnocellular regions of the lateral geniculate nucleus and subsequently photo-filled. Presumed bipolar cell synapses were identified immunocytochemically using antibodies against the ribbon protein CtBP2 or the GluR4 subunit of the AMPA receptor. For all cells, colocalized immunoreactive puncta were distributed across the entire dendritic tree. The density of the presumed bipolar input to midget ganglion cells was comparable for both synaptic markers, suggesting that the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit is expressed at all synapses between midget bipolar and midget ganglion cells. Midget ganglion cells had an average of nine colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface, and parasol cells had an average of seven colocalized immunoreactive puncta per 100 microm2 dendritic surface. The densities were comparable in different regions of the dendritic tree and were not influenced by the location of the cells with respect to the fovea. Our findings suggest that the differences in the response characteristics of midget and parasol cells are not due to differences in the density of synaptic input to their dendritic tree.

UR - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=1738328&jid=VNS&volumeId=25&issueId=01&aid=1738324&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyE=

U2 - 10.1017/S0952523808080073

DO - 10.1017/S0952523808080073

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 67

EP - 76

JO - Visual Neuroscience

JF - Visual Neuroscience

SN - 0952-5238

IS - 1

ER -