Distinguishing injustice, exploitation and harm: the impossibility result

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article advances what it calls the ‘Impossibility Result’: it is impossible to claim that the reduction of exploitation leads to the improvement of efficiency. The Impossibility Result is the inevitable result of the proposed conceptual difference between ‘injustice’ and ‘exploitation’. Injustice occurs when one member of a society deviates from the norms and the legal rules concerning how one should treat other members of that society. Exploitation occurs when one member of a society takes advantage of entities such wild animals, cattle, a field of vegetables, or other people that lie outside the boundary of that society. In many cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive some benefit, as in the case when enslavement is better than death. In other cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive zero benefit, called here ‘harm’, as in the case when a deer is hunted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages24-52
Number of pages29
JournalTheoria
Volume64
Issue number152
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Cite this

@article{55cfb8179aa04401944fb76f66c8cec1,
title = "Distinguishing injustice, exploitation and harm: the impossibility result",
abstract = "This article advances what it calls the ‘Impossibility Result’: it is impossible to claim that the reduction of exploitation leads to the improvement of efficiency. The Impossibility Result is the inevitable result of the proposed conceptual difference between ‘injustice’ and ‘exploitation’. Injustice occurs when one member of a society deviates from the norms and the legal rules concerning how one should treat other members of that society. Exploitation occurs when one member of a society takes advantage of entities such wild animals, cattle, a field of vegetables, or other people that lie outside the boundary of that society. In many cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive some benefit, as in the case when enslavement is better than death. In other cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive zero benefit, called here ‘harm’, as in the case when a deer is hunted.",
author = "Khalil, {Elias L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3167/th.2017.6415202",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "24--52",
journal = "Theoria",
issn = "0040-5817",
publisher = "Berghahn Books",
number = "152",

}

Distinguishing injustice, exploitation and harm : the impossibility result. / Khalil, Elias L.

In: Theoria, Vol. 64, No. 152, 09.2017, p. 24-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinguishing injustice, exploitation and harm

T2 - Theoria

AU - Khalil, Elias L.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - This article advances what it calls the ‘Impossibility Result’: it is impossible to claim that the reduction of exploitation leads to the improvement of efficiency. The Impossibility Result is the inevitable result of the proposed conceptual difference between ‘injustice’ and ‘exploitation’. Injustice occurs when one member of a society deviates from the norms and the legal rules concerning how one should treat other members of that society. Exploitation occurs when one member of a society takes advantage of entities such wild animals, cattle, a field of vegetables, or other people that lie outside the boundary of that society. In many cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive some benefit, as in the case when enslavement is better than death. In other cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive zero benefit, called here ‘harm’, as in the case when a deer is hunted.

AB - This article advances what it calls the ‘Impossibility Result’: it is impossible to claim that the reduction of exploitation leads to the improvement of efficiency. The Impossibility Result is the inevitable result of the proposed conceptual difference between ‘injustice’ and ‘exploitation’. Injustice occurs when one member of a society deviates from the norms and the legal rules concerning how one should treat other members of that society. Exploitation occurs when one member of a society takes advantage of entities such wild animals, cattle, a field of vegetables, or other people that lie outside the boundary of that society. In many cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive some benefit, as in the case when enslavement is better than death. In other cases of exploitation, the exploited may derive zero benefit, called here ‘harm’, as in the case when a deer is hunted.

U2 - 10.3167/th.2017.6415202

DO - 10.3167/th.2017.6415202

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 24

EP - 52

JO - Theoria

JF - Theoria

SN - 0040-5817

IS - 152

ER -