TY - JOUR
T1 - Disjunction in the subjective and objective measurement of co-occurring depression in borderline personality disorder – Implications for diagnosis
AU - Cheney, Lukas
AU - Broadbear, Jillian H.
AU - Rao, Sathya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2022.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objective: Research and clinical experience suggest that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are more likely to report greater severity of depressive symptoms than is objectively measured by their clinician. The prominence of low mood in association with BPD can result in the treatment of depressive symptoms being prioritised over the diagnosis and treatment of BPD. Method: This study investigated the utility of validated clinician-administered and self-report depression rating scales during psychiatric assessment of 49 clients diagnosed with BPD. Results: Considerable discrepancies emerged between client and clinician ratings of depression, with client-rated scales generating significantly higher depression scores. Both client-rated and clinician-rated depression scores were positively influenced by the severity of BPD symptoms. Conclusions: These findings raise questions about the interpretation of rating scales in clinical decision-making and highlight inherent uncertainty when diagnosing major depressive disorder in people who have borderline personality disorder. The accurate diagnosis of low mood has significant implications for the treatment and management of both disorders.
AB - Objective: Research and clinical experience suggest that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are more likely to report greater severity of depressive symptoms than is objectively measured by their clinician. The prominence of low mood in association with BPD can result in the treatment of depressive symptoms being prioritised over the diagnosis and treatment of BPD. Method: This study investigated the utility of validated clinician-administered and self-report depression rating scales during psychiatric assessment of 49 clients diagnosed with BPD. Results: Considerable discrepancies emerged between client and clinician ratings of depression, with client-rated scales generating significantly higher depression scores. Both client-rated and clinician-rated depression scores were positively influenced by the severity of BPD symptoms. Conclusions: These findings raise questions about the interpretation of rating scales in clinical decision-making and highlight inherent uncertainty when diagnosing major depressive disorder in people who have borderline personality disorder. The accurate diagnosis of low mood has significant implications for the treatment and management of both disorders.
KW - assessment
KW - Borderline personality disorder
KW - differential diagnosis
KW - major depressive disorder
KW - self-report instruments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125081269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10398562211065296
DO - 10.1177/10398562211065296
M3 - Article
C2 - 35138174
AN - SCOPUS:85125081269
SN - 1039-8562
VL - 30
SP - 481
EP - 485
JO - Australasian Psychiatry
JF - Australasian Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -