### Abstract

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 482 - 510 |

Number of pages | 29 |

Journal | Journal of Fluid Mechanics |

Volume | 661 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 2010 |

Externally published | Yes |

### Cite this

}

**Discrete particle simulation of particle-fluid flow: model formulations and their applicability.** / Zhou, Zongyan; Kuang, Shibo; Chu, Kaiwei; Yu, Aibing.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrete particle simulation of particle-fluid flow: model formulations and their applicability

AU - Zhou, Zongyan

AU - Kuang, Shibo

AU - Chu, Kaiwei

AU - Yu, Aibing

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The approach of combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for continuum fluid and the discrete element method (DEM) for discrete particles has been increasingly used to study the fundamentals of coupled particle-fluid flows. Different CFD-DEM models have been used. However, the origin and the applicability of these models are not clearly understood. In this paper, the origin of different model formulations is discussed first. It shows that, in connection with the continuum approach, three sets of formulations exist in the CFD-DEM approach: an original format set I, and subsequent derivations of set II and set III, respectively, corresponding to the so-called model A and model B in the literature. A comparison and the applicability of the three models are assessed theoretically and then verified from the study of three representative particle-fluid flow systems: fluidization, pneumatic conveying and hydrocyclones. It is demonstrated that sets I and II are essentially the same, with small differences resulting from different mathematical or numerical treatments of a few terms in the original equation. Set III is however a simplified version of set I. The testing cases show that all the three models are applicable to gas fluidization and, to a large extent, pneumatic conveying. However, the application of set III is conditional, as demonstrated in the case of hydrocyclones. Strictly speaking, set III is only valid when fluid flow is steady and uniform. Set II and, in particular, set I, which is somehow forgotten in the literature, are recommended for the future CFD-DEM modelling of complex particle-fluid flow.

AB - The approach of combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for continuum fluid and the discrete element method (DEM) for discrete particles has been increasingly used to study the fundamentals of coupled particle-fluid flows. Different CFD-DEM models have been used. However, the origin and the applicability of these models are not clearly understood. In this paper, the origin of different model formulations is discussed first. It shows that, in connection with the continuum approach, three sets of formulations exist in the CFD-DEM approach: an original format set I, and subsequent derivations of set II and set III, respectively, corresponding to the so-called model A and model B in the literature. A comparison and the applicability of the three models are assessed theoretically and then verified from the study of three representative particle-fluid flow systems: fluidization, pneumatic conveying and hydrocyclones. It is demonstrated that sets I and II are essentially the same, with small differences resulting from different mathematical or numerical treatments of a few terms in the original equation. Set III is however a simplified version of set I. The testing cases show that all the three models are applicable to gas fluidization and, to a large extent, pneumatic conveying. However, the application of set III is conditional, as demonstrated in the case of hydrocyclones. Strictly speaking, set III is only valid when fluid flow is steady and uniform. Set II and, in particular, set I, which is somehow forgotten in the literature, are recommended for the future CFD-DEM modelling of complex particle-fluid flow.

UR - http://goo.gl/uPvIqT

U2 - 10.1017/S002211201000306X

DO - 10.1017/S002211201000306X

M3 - Article

VL - 661

SP - 482

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Fluid Mechanics

JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics

SN - 0022-1120

ER -